The changing of legal concept's means: on the views of three legal theory schools
WU Bing-xin
Abstract
WU Bing-xin
Abstract
The difference ontology attitudes which natural law jurisprudence,analytic jurisprudence and social jurisprudence owns,decide the difference ways which they deal with the interpretation of legal concept.We find that the two former schools always run into agnosticism in the logical operation,but the latter leads to absolutely uncertainty.So,in order to release the means of legal concept,we have to choose a proper view of legal ontology.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The difference ontology attitudes which natural law jurisprudence,analytic jurisprudence and social jurisprudence owns,decide the difference ways which they deal with the interpretation of legal concept.We find that the two former schools always run into agnosticism in the logical operation,but the latter leads to absolutely uncertainty.So,in order to release the means of legal concept,we have to choose a proper view of legal ontology.
Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Interpretation (philosophy), Ontology, Agnosticism, Order (exchange), Epistemology, Empirical legal studies, Natural (archaeology)