2009Pharmacy TodayRequires access

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on Meropenem in Respiratory Bacterial Infections

WU Xi-ying

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem in the treatment of respiratory bacterial infections.Methods A single blind randomized,parallel controlled clinical trial was carried out.In the study,118 patients were enrolled in treatment group(meropenem 500 mg IV.q8 h),and another 114 patients were enrolled in control group(cefdizime 2 g IV.q12 h),with a course of 7 to 14 d for both groups.The clinical efficacy and safety together with adverse reactions were investigated and compared between 2 groups.Results The cure rates and total effective rates for the treatment and control groups were 83.9%,79.8%,95.8%,and 95.6%,respectively.The bacterial clearance rates were both 99.2%,and the incidences of drug adverse reactions were 7.4% and 6.8%,respectively.There were no statistically significant differences between the results of both groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Meropenem is effective and safe for treating acute bacterial infection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem in the treatment of respiratory bacterial infections.Methods A single blind randomized,parallel controlled clinical trial was carried out.In the study,118 patients were enrolled in treatment group(meropenem 500 mg IV.q8 h),and another 114 patients were enrolled in control group(cefdizime 2 g IV.q12 h),with a course of 7 to 14 d for both groups.The clinical efficacy and safety together with adverse reactions were investigated and compared between 2 groups.Results The cure rates and total effective rates for the treatment and control groups were 83.9%,79.8%,95.8%,and 95.6%,respectively.The bacterial clearance rates were both 99.2%,and the incidences of drug adverse reactions were 7.4% and 6.8%,respectively.There were no statistically significant differences between the results of both groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Meropenem is effective and safe for treating acute bacterial infection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem in the treatment of respiratory bacterial infections.Methods A single blind randomized,parallel controlled clinical trial was carried out.In the study,118 patients were enrolled in treatment group(meropenem 500 mg IV.q8 h),and another 114 patients were enrolled in control group(cefdizime 2 g IV.q12 h),with a course of 7 to 14 d for both groups.The clinical efficacy and safety together with adverse reactions were investigated and compared between 2 groups.Results The cure rates and total effective rates for the treatment and control groups were 83.9%,79.8%,95.8%,and 95.6%,respectively.The bacterial clearance rates were both 99.2%,and the incidences of drug adverse reactions were 7.4% and 6.8%,respectively.There were no statistically significant differences between the results of both groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Meropenem is effective and safe for treating acute bacterial infection.

Key concepts: Meropenem, Medicine, Adverse effect, Randomized controlled trial, Internal medicine, Clinical trial, Drug reaction, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on Meropenem in Respiratory Bacterial Infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens