2012Journal of Shandong UniversityRequires access

Clinical observation of the inlays made of different materials in restoring the molar defect

Yin Jing

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Au alloy inlays,IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays,Ceramage inlays and resin restoration in restoring the molar defect.Methods 45 Au alloy inlays,48 Ceramage inlays,44 IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays and 52 composite resin were used to restore 189 molars from 138 patients respectively.All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters.Results There was no significant difference in the color match,marginal sealability,secondary carries and food embed between the three groups(P0.05).The Au alloy inlays and Ceramage inlays showed a significantly better performance in resisting fracture than the ceramic inlays(P0.05).There was a significant difference in the gingival response and food embed between the resin fillings and the inlays(P0.05).Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to resin restoration in the aspects of restoring proximal relationship and maintaining periodontal health.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Au alloy inlays,IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays,Ceramage inlays and resin restoration in restoring the molar defect.Methods 45 Au alloy inlays,48 Ceramage inlays,44 IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays and 52 composite resin were used to restore 189 molars from 138 patients respectively.All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters.Results There was no significant difference in the color match,marginal sealability,secondary carries and food embed between the three groups(P0.05).The Au alloy inlays and Ceramage inlays showed a significantly better performance in resisting fracture than the ceramic inlays(P0.05).There was a significant difference in the gingival response and food embed between the resin fillings and the inlays(P0.05).Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to resin restoration in the aspects of restoring proximal relationship and maintaining periodontal health.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Au alloy inlays,IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays,Ceramage inlays and resin restoration in restoring the molar defect.Methods 45 Au alloy inlays,48 Ceramage inlays,44 IPS EmpressⅡceramic inlays and 52 composite resin were used to restore 189 molars from 138 patients respectively.All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters.Results There was no significant difference in the color match,marginal sealability,secondary carries and food embed between the three groups(P0.05).The Au alloy inlays and Ceramage inlays showed a significantly better performance in resisting fracture than the ceramic inlays(P0.05).There was a significant difference in the gingival response and food embed between the resin fillings and the inlays(P0.05).Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to resin restoration in the aspects of restoring proximal relationship and maintaining periodontal health.

Key concepts: Inlay, Molar, Dentistry, Materials science, Significant difference, Ceramic, Orthodontics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation of the inlays made of different materials in restoring the molar defect — Research Paper | ScholarLens