2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Study of three kinds of inlays for restoration of molars destruction

Chen Xiao-we

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic inlays, Au alloy inlays and polymeric porcelain inlays in restoring the molar defect. Methods According to the materials chosen by patients,197 cases selected with indications were divided into four groups:47 cases for ceramic inlays,47 cases for Au alloy inlays, 50 cases for polymeric porcelain inlays and 53 cases for composite resin. All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters. Results No statistically significant difference was shown for gingival status between three inlays,and there was significant difference between inlays groups and composite resin group. Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to restoration in the aspects of maintaining periodontal health.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic inlays, Au alloy inlays and polymeric porcelain inlays in restoring the molar defect. Methods According to the materials chosen by patients,197 cases selected with indications were divided into four groups:47 cases for ceramic inlays,47 cases for Au alloy inlays, 50 cases for polymeric porcelain inlays and 53 cases for composite resin. All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters. Results No statistically significant difference was shown for gingival status between three inlays,and there was significant difference between inlays groups and composite resin group. Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to restoration in the aspects of maintaining periodontal health.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic inlays, Au alloy inlays and polymeric porcelain inlays in restoring the molar defect. Methods According to the materials chosen by patients,197 cases selected with indications were divided into four groups:47 cases for ceramic inlays,47 cases for Au alloy inlays, 50 cases for polymeric porcelain inlays and 53 cases for composite resin. All restorations were evaluated after half a year according to modified USPHS parameters. Results No statistically significant difference was shown for gingival status between three inlays,and there was significant difference between inlays groups and composite resin group. Conclusion It is an intriguing method using inlays to restore the molar defect,which is superior to restoration in the aspects of maintaining periodontal health.

Key concepts: Inlay, Molar, Medicine, Dentistry, Significant difference, Orthodontics, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of three kinds of inlays for restoration of molars destruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens