2014•Clinical Education of General PracticeRequires access

Clinical evaluation of serum pepsinogen in diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma

Liang Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical significance of serum pepsinogen(PG) in diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods The serum concentrations of PG I and PG II in 20 cases of superficial gastritis, 20 cases of atrophic gastritis, 20 cases of gastric ulcer, and 68 cases of gastric cancer were detected with latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, and PG ratio(PGR) was subsequently calculated. Results The serum PG I level and PGR in gastric adenocarcinoma group were significantly lower than those in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric ulcer group(P0.05). The serum PG I concentration in gastric ulcer group was significantly higher than that in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric adenocarcinoma group(P 0.05). The PG I level and PGR decreased significantly in atrophic gastritis group compared to superficial gastritis and gastric ulcer groups(P0.05). But for PG II, there was no statistical difference in patients of four groups(P0.05). In addition, ROC curves analysis revealed PG I and PGR with an area under curve(AUC) of 0.961 and 0.963, respectively. There was certain correlation between PGR and differentiation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Serum PG I concentration and PGR were remarkably valuable for diagnosis of the gastric adenocarcinoma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the clinical significance of serum pepsinogen(PG) in diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods The serum concentrations of PG I and PG II in 20 cases of superficial gastritis, 20 cases of atrophic gastritis, 20 cases of gastric ulcer, and 68 cases of gastric cancer were detected with latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, and PG ratio(PGR) was subsequently calculated. Results The serum PG I level and PGR in gastric adenocarcinoma group were significantly lower than those in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric ulcer group(P0.05). The serum PG I concentration in gastric ulcer group was significantly higher than that in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric adenocarcinoma group(P 0.05). The PG I level and PGR decreased significantly in atrophic gastritis group compared to superficial gastritis and gastric ulcer groups(P0.05). But for PG II, there was no statistical difference in patients of four groups(P0.05). In addition, ROC curves analysis revealed PG I and PGR with an area under curve(AUC) of 0.961 and 0.963, respectively. There was certain correlation between PGR and differentiation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Serum PG I concentration and PGR were remarkably valuable for diagnosis of the gastric adenocarcinoma.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the clinical significance of serum pepsinogen(PG) in diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods The serum concentrations of PG I and PG II in 20 cases of superficial gastritis, 20 cases of atrophic gastritis, 20 cases of gastric ulcer, and 68 cases of gastric cancer were detected with latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, and PG ratio(PGR) was subsequently calculated. Results The serum PG I level and PGR in gastric adenocarcinoma group were significantly lower than those in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric ulcer group(P0.05). The serum PG I concentration in gastric ulcer group was significantly higher than that in superficial gastritis, atrophic gastritis, or gastric adenocarcinoma group(P 0.05). The PG I level and PGR decreased significantly in atrophic gastritis group compared to superficial gastritis and gastric ulcer groups(P0.05). But for PG II, there was no statistical difference in patients of four groups(P0.05). In addition, ROC curves analysis revealed PG I and PGR with an area under curve(AUC) of 0.961 and 0.963, respectively. There was certain correlation between PGR and differentiation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Serum PG I concentration and PGR were remarkably valuable for diagnosis of the gastric adenocarcinoma.

Key concepts: Medicine, Atrophic gastritis, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Gastritis, Adenocarcinoma, Gastric adenocarcinoma, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of serum pepsinogen in diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens