2005Journal of Clinical Pulmonary MedicineRequires access

Clinical analysis of treating spontaneous pneumothorax through thoracic drainage of the central vein catheter

WU Hua-jia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the curative effects and complications in treating the spontaneous pneumothorax of using thoracic closed drainage of central vein catheter and of using thick silica gel catheter.Methods Twenty-five cases of spontaneous pneumothorax had the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter, while 28 cases in the same condition had the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter.Results Their curative effects were similar without obvious differences, but the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter had more complications.Conclusion The treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax through the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter is satisfactory remedy with little side effect and fewer complications. It is simple to use and had comfortable tolerance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the curative effects and complications in treating the spontaneous pneumothorax of using thoracic closed drainage of central vein catheter and of using thick silica gel catheter.Methods Twenty-five cases of spontaneous pneumothorax had the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter, while 28 cases in the same condition had the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter.Results Their curative effects were similar without obvious differences, but the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter had more complications.Conclusion The treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax through the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter is satisfactory remedy with little side effect and fewer complications. It is simple to use and had comfortable tolerance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the curative effects and complications in treating the spontaneous pneumothorax of using thoracic closed drainage of central vein catheter and of using thick silica gel catheter.Methods Twenty-five cases of spontaneous pneumothorax had the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter, while 28 cases in the same condition had the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter.Results Their curative effects were similar without obvious differences, but the thoracic closed drainage of the thick silica gel catheter had more complications.Conclusion The treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax through the thoracic closed drainage of the central vein catheter is satisfactory remedy with little side effect and fewer complications. It is simple to use and had comfortable tolerance.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pneumothorax, Catheter, Surgery, Drainage, Vein, Central venous catheter, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical analysis of treating spontaneous pneumothorax through thoracic drainage of the central vein catheter — Research Paper | ScholarLens