2014Chinese Journal of the Frontiers of Medical ScienceRequires access

Severe craniocerebral injury were treated by analysis of the clinical efficacy of damage control surgery

Yuan Yu-cu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Clinical use of damage control surgery curative effect analysis for the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Method Selected 92 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients, in our hospital in August 2012 to December 2013 according to the random number table method grouped into control group and treatment group. Control group with traditional bone disc decompression treatment, the treatment group USES the damage control surgery. Observed two groups of patients with GCS score and quality of life scores before and after the treatment, prognosis and clinical curative effect. Result Before the treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(6.3±1.5) points, and the observation group patients(6.4±1.4) points was no significant difference(P 0.05); after treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(4.2±0.7) points, observation group patients(1.6±0.3) points, all had significant difference compared with before treatment(P 0.05), but the observation group was better than that of control group(P 0.05). In addition, two groups of patients before and after treatment dramatically improve the quality of life score, prognosis and clinical curative effect of observation group was obviously better than that of control group(P 0.05). Conclusion The damage control surgery in patients with severe craniocerebral injury, which can effectively improve the nerve function defect grade and prognosis of patients, improve patient quality of life.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Clinical use of damage control surgery curative effect analysis for the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Method Selected 92 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients, in our hospital in August 2012 to December 2013 according to the random number table method grouped into control group and treatment group. Control group with traditional bone disc decompression treatment, the treatment group USES the damage control surgery. Observed two groups of patients with GCS score and quality of life scores before and after the treatment, prognosis and clinical curative effect. Result Before the treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(6.3±1.5) points, and the observation group patients(6.4±1.4) points was no significant difference(P 0.05); after treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(4.2±0.7) points, observation group patients(1.6±0.3) points, all had significant difference compared with before treatment(P 0.05), but the observation group was better than that of control group(P 0.05). In addition, two groups of patients before and after treatment dramatically improve the quality of life score, prognosis and clinical curative effect of observation group was obviously better than that of control group(P 0.05). Conclusion The damage control surgery in patients with severe craniocerebral injury, which can effectively improve the nerve function defect grade and prognosis of patients, improve patient quality of life.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Clinical use of damage control surgery curative effect analysis for the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Method Selected 92 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients, in our hospital in August 2012 to December 2013 according to the random number table method grouped into control group and treatment group. Control group with traditional bone disc decompression treatment, the treatment group USES the damage control surgery. Observed two groups of patients with GCS score and quality of life scores before and after the treatment, prognosis and clinical curative effect. Result Before the treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(6.3±1.5) points, and the observation group patients(6.4±1.4) points was no significant difference(P 0.05); after treatment, the GCS score for patients with the control group(4.2±0.7) points, observation group patients(1.6±0.3) points, all had significant difference compared with before treatment(P 0.05), but the observation group was better than that of control group(P 0.05). In addition, two groups of patients before and after treatment dramatically improve the quality of life score, prognosis and clinical curative effect of observation group was obviously better than that of control group(P 0.05). Conclusion The damage control surgery in patients with severe craniocerebral injury, which can effectively improve the nerve function defect grade and prognosis of patients, improve patient quality of life.

Key concepts: Medicine, Quality of life (healthcare), Surgery, Treatment and control groups, Clinical efficacy, Damage control surgery, Decompression, Damage control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Severe craniocerebral injury were treated by analysis of the clinical efficacy of damage control surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens