2005•Henan yixue yanjiuRequires access

Contrast study of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q_(10) for stable exertional angina

Kong Shen-yan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q10 for treatment of patients with stable exertional angina.Methods: 108 patients with stable exertional angina were randomly divided into trimetazidine group (n=54) and coenzyme Q10 group(n=54).Two group were combined with any one of nitrates,β blockers and calcium antagonists to aspirin.The trimetazidine group were given trimetazidine 20 mg,po,tid for 12 weeks While the coenzyme Q10 group were received coenzyme Q10 20 mg,po tid for 12 weeks.Clinical treatment effective indexes were observed.Results: Total efficacy rates in relieving angina symptom and improving the ECG parameters of the trimetazidine group were 94.4% and 68.5%, respectivealy.The same parameters of coenzyme Q10 group were 88.9% and 59.3% respetively.The above parameters of trimetazidine group were remarkably better than coenzyme Q10 group (P0.05).Conclusion: The efficacies of trimetazidine are better than coenzyme Q10 for stable exertional angina.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the effect of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q10 for treatment of patients with stable exertional angina.Methods: 108 patients with stable exertional angina were randomly divided into trimetazidine group (n=54) and coenzyme Q10 group(n=54).Two group were combined with any one of nitrates,β blockers and calcium antagonists to aspirin.The trimetazidine group were given trimetazidine 20 mg,po,tid for 12 weeks While the coenzyme Q10 group were received coenzyme Q10 20 mg,po tid for 12 weeks.Clinical treatment effective indexes were observed.Results: Total efficacy rates in relieving angina symptom and improving the ECG parameters of the trimetazidine group were 94.4% and 68.5%, respectivealy.The same parameters of coenzyme Q10 group were 88.9% and 59.3% respetively.The above parameters of trimetazidine group were remarkably better than coenzyme Q10 group (P0.05).Conclusion: The efficacies of trimetazidine are better than coenzyme Q10 for stable exertional angina.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q10 for treatment of patients with stable exertional angina.Methods: 108 patients with stable exertional angina were randomly divided into trimetazidine group (n=54) and coenzyme Q10 group(n=54).Two group were combined with any one of nitrates,β blockers and calcium antagonists to aspirin.The trimetazidine group were given trimetazidine 20 mg,po,tid for 12 weeks While the coenzyme Q10 group were received coenzyme Q10 20 mg,po tid for 12 weeks.Clinical treatment effective indexes were observed.Results: Total efficacy rates in relieving angina symptom and improving the ECG parameters of the trimetazidine group were 94.4% and 68.5%, respectivealy.The same parameters of coenzyme Q10 group were 88.9% and 59.3% respetively.The above parameters of trimetazidine group were remarkably better than coenzyme Q10 group (P0.05).Conclusion: The efficacies of trimetazidine are better than coenzyme Q10 for stable exertional angina.

Key concepts: Trimetazidine, Coenzyme Q10, Medicine, Angina, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Myocardial infarction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contrast study of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q_(10) for stable exertional angina — Research Paper | ScholarLens