Omeprazole vs ranitidine in treating peptic ulcer with acute massive bleeding
Tong Gu
Abstract
Tong Gu
Abstract
Sixty-four patients with peptic ulcer with acute massive bleeding were equally divided into two groups.The omeprazole group(M26,F6;age 46±s 17 a) received omeprazole 40 mg,iv,q12 h,for 3d.The ranitidine group(M 25,F 7;age 47±16 a) received ranitidine 100 mg in 5% glucose solution 100mL, iv gtt,q 12 h, for 3-5d.They all aceepted routine antipeptic ulcer therapy after bleeding stopped.Definitive hemostasis was achieved in all the former group,but failed in 6 patients in the latter group(P0.05).The former group needed less days of hospitalization(P0.01),and less days of turning stool occult blood tests to negative(P0.01)in comparison with the latter group.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Sixty-four patients with peptic ulcer with acute massive bleeding were equally divided into two groups.The omeprazole group(M26,F6;age 46±s 17 a) received omeprazole 40 mg,iv,q12 h,for 3d.The ranitidine group(M 25,F 7;age 47±16 a) received ranitidine 100 mg in 5% glucose solution 100mL, iv gtt,q 12 h, for 3-5d.They all aceepted routine antipeptic ulcer therapy after bleeding stopped.Definitive hemostasis was achieved in all the former group,but failed in 6 patients in the latter group(P0.05).The former group needed less days of hospitalization(P0.01),and less days of turning stool occult blood tests to negative(P0.01)in comparison with the latter group.
Key concepts: Ranitidine, Omeprazole, Medicine, Peptic ulcer, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Peptic, Hemostasis