2009•Progress in Biomedical EngineeringRequires access

Comparison between Two Digital Imaging Detector System:Image Qulity and Radiation Dose

Zhu Wei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess and compare the difference in image qulity and exposure dose between the flat panel digital radiography(DR) system and computed radiography(CR). Methods A contrast-detail phantom CDRAD2. 0 was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets. The en-trance surface doses were recorded for all images. Images was analyzed by assessing software of CDRAD2.0,The image quality figure inverse number(IQFinv) was measured for each image. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's correlation test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the difference in image quality and exposure dose between DR and CR.Results With different mAs value of tube current dosage,The IQFinv difference between DR and CR showed statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Image quality of FPD has been proved to be far superior to that of IP,in par-ticular for low contrast detail. The clinical application of DR will reduce the exposure dose to the patient greatly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess and compare the difference in image qulity and exposure dose between the flat panel digital radiography(DR) system and computed radiography(CR). Methods A contrast-detail phantom CDRAD2. 0 was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets. The en-trance surface doses were recorded for all images. Images was analyzed by assessing software of CDRAD2.0,The image quality figure inverse number(IQFinv) was measured for each image. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's correlation test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the difference in image quality and exposure dose between DR and CR.Results With different mAs value of tube current dosage,The IQFinv difference between DR and CR showed statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Image quality of FPD has been proved to be far superior to that of IP,in par-ticular for low contrast detail. The clinical application of DR will reduce the exposure dose to the patient greatly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess and compare the difference in image qulity and exposure dose between the flat panel digital radiography(DR) system and computed radiography(CR). Methods A contrast-detail phantom CDRAD2. 0 was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets. The en-trance surface doses were recorded for all images. Images was analyzed by assessing software of CDRAD2.0,The image quality figure inverse number(IQFinv) was measured for each image. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's correlation test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the difference in image quality and exposure dose between DR and CR.Results With different mAs value of tube current dosage,The IQFinv difference between DR and CR showed statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Image quality of FPD has been proved to be far superior to that of IP,in par-ticular for low contrast detail. The clinical application of DR will reduce the exposure dose to the patient greatly.

Key concepts: Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Image quality, Imaging phantom, Radiation dose, Digital radiography, Nuclear medicine, Statistical significance, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Two Digital Imaging Detector System:Image Qulity and Radiation Dose — Research Paper | ScholarLens