2009•Modern hospitalRequires access

EFFECT OF FOUR KINDS OF IN HEMODYNAMIC ANESTHESIA INDUCTION AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN HEMODYNAMIC

Zhong Jinxiu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of the etomidate、propofol、midazolam and propofol +midazolam on the hemodynamic response during induction and intubation of general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients,ASAI-II,22-60Y,were divided ramdomly into four groups: groupA(etomidate,n=15),groupB(midazolam,n=15),groupC(propofol),group D(midazolam+propofol).Patients received fentenyl 3 μg /kg,vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg,etomidate 0.3 mg/kg in group A,midazolam 0.3 mg/kg in group B,propofol 2mg/kg in group C,midazolam 0.1mg/kg+propofol 1mg/kg in group D for induction and intubation at 5min after induction.The vital signs(BP,HR,Spo2) during induction and intubation were recored.Results After induction,the BP and HR decreased in all groups.It singnificantly decreased in group B and C(p0.05).The BP and HR were ascended in all groups after intubating it was significantly different with perinduction in group A(p0.01).it was no significantly different between perinduction and postinduction in groupB、C and D.Conclusion The etomidate could not depress the hight haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively;propofol、midazolam and propofol+midazolam could depress the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively,but propofol+midazolam has more stability haemodynamic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effects of the etomidate、propofol、midazolam and propofol +midazolam on the hemodynamic response during induction and intubation of general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients,ASAI-II,22-60Y,were divided ramdomly into four groups: groupA(etomidate,n=15),groupB(midazolam,n=15),groupC(propofol),group D(midazolam+propofol).Patients received fentenyl 3 μg /kg,vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg,etomidate 0.3 mg/kg in group A,midazolam 0.3 mg/kg in group B,propofol 2mg/kg in group C,midazolam 0.1mg/kg+propofol 1mg/kg in group D for induction and intubation at 5min after induction.The vital signs(BP,HR,Spo2) during induction and intubation were recored.Results After induction,the BP and HR decreased in all groups.It singnificantly decreased in group B and C(p0.05).The BP and HR were ascended in all groups after intubating it was significantly different with perinduction in group A(p0.01).it was no significantly different between perinduction and postinduction in groupB、C and D.Conclusion The etomidate could not depress the hight haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively;propofol、midazolam and propofol+midazolam could depress the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively,but propofol+midazolam has more stability haemodynamic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effects of the etomidate、propofol、midazolam and propofol +midazolam on the hemodynamic response during induction and intubation of general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients,ASAI-II,22-60Y,were divided ramdomly into four groups: groupA(etomidate,n=15),groupB(midazolam,n=15),groupC(propofol),group D(midazolam+propofol).Patients received fentenyl 3 μg /kg,vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg,etomidate 0.3 mg/kg in group A,midazolam 0.3 mg/kg in group B,propofol 2mg/kg in group C,midazolam 0.1mg/kg+propofol 1mg/kg in group D for induction and intubation at 5min after induction.The vital signs(BP,HR,Spo2) during induction and intubation were recored.Results After induction,the BP and HR decreased in all groups.It singnificantly decreased in group B and C(p0.05).The BP and HR were ascended in all groups after intubating it was significantly different with perinduction in group A(p0.01).it was no significantly different between perinduction and postinduction in groupB、C and D.Conclusion The etomidate could not depress the hight haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively;propofol、midazolam and propofol+midazolam could depress the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation effectively,but propofol+midazolam has more stability haemodynamic.

Key concepts: Midazolam, Propofol, Etomidate, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Laryngoscopy, Intubation, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECT OF FOUR KINDS OF IN HEMODYNAMIC ANESTHESIA INDUCTION AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN HEMODYNAMIC — Research Paper | ScholarLens