109 Cases Clinical Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia with Cold Knife Conization(CKC) and Cervical Plasty
Ban Ning-yuan
Abstract
Ban Ning-yuan
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the value of cervical conization in diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesion.Methods: A retrospective study was carried to evaluate 109 cases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnoses by cytological Examination and biopsies from January 2007 to Dcember 2007.Results: 58(53.2%) cases had the same pathological reports between colposcopic multiple biopsies(MB) and CKC,51 cases had different results.Among the 19(18.01%) cases pathological results of CKC were in higher grade than those of MB.Among the 31(28.70%) cases pathological results of CKC were in lower grade than those of MB.After conization radical hysterectomy was performed in 2 cases(1.83%) because of early invasive carcinoma and simple hysterectomy was performed in 13 cases(11.93%) because of CINⅢ involved the gland and microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.94 cases were perseverated fertility.During the follow up time of 12-18 months,no cytology abnormality was detected and 2 patients had pregnancy and no threatened abortion.Conclusions: CKC is a good choice for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia which have security,higher curative rate,fewer postoperative complications,perseveration fertility and early preventing cervical cancer.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To evaluate the value of cervical conization in diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesion.Methods: A retrospective study was carried to evaluate 109 cases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnoses by cytological Examination and biopsies from January 2007 to Dcember 2007.Results: 58(53.2%) cases had the same pathological reports between colposcopic multiple biopsies(MB) and CKC,51 cases had different results.Among the 19(18.01%) cases pathological results of CKC were in higher grade than those of MB.Among the 31(28.70%) cases pathological results of CKC were in lower grade than those of MB.After conization radical hysterectomy was performed in 2 cases(1.83%) because of early invasive carcinoma and simple hysterectomy was performed in 13 cases(11.93%) because of CINⅢ involved the gland and microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.94 cases were perseverated fertility.During the follow up time of 12-18 months,no cytology abnormality was detected and 2 patients had pregnancy and no threatened abortion.Conclusions: CKC is a good choice for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia which have security,higher curative rate,fewer postoperative complications,perseveration fertility and early preventing cervical cancer.
Key concepts: Medicine, Cervical conization, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Pathological, Cervix, Hysterectomy, Cervical cancer, Dysplasia