The effect of propofol combining with fentany on painless artificial abortion
Haifeng Sun
Abstract
Haifeng Sun
Abstract
Objective To compare propefol and combining propofol with fentany for patient with artificial abortion. Methods Four hundreds patients scheduled for painless artificial abortion were raedomized to two groups: 1.5mg/kg of propofol (group P) or 0.05mg of Fentany and 1.5mg/kg of propofol (group F) were administered respectively. Bolus propofol 20~30mg was added when the patient moved danling the operation. Intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure were monitored. Ephedrine added as needed. Operation time, total consumption of propefol, time of wakening, time of stay in the operation room and postoperative uterine contration pain were recorded. Resnlts Total comsumption of propofol was less in group F than in group P(PO.O1). Whereas postoperative uterine contration pain in group F was lower than that in group P (P0.O1). There were no difference between the two group in SpO2, time of waking, time of stay in the operation room and the rate of PONV. Conclusions Combining fentany and propofol can reduce the consumption of anesthetics comparing to propofol alone for patient of painless arfificial abortion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare propefol and combining propofol with fentany for patient with artificial abortion. Methods Four hundreds patients scheduled for painless artificial abortion were raedomized to two groups: 1.5mg/kg of propofol (group P) or 0.05mg of Fentany and 1.5mg/kg of propofol (group F) were administered respectively. Bolus propofol 20~30mg was added when the patient moved danling the operation. Intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure were monitored. Ephedrine added as needed. Operation time, total consumption of propefol, time of wakening, time of stay in the operation room and postoperative uterine contration pain were recorded. Resnlts Total comsumption of propofol was less in group F than in group P(PO.O1). Whereas postoperative uterine contration pain in group F was lower than that in group P (P0.O1). There were no difference between the two group in SpO2, time of waking, time of stay in the operation room and the rate of PONV. Conclusions Combining fentany and propofol can reduce the consumption of anesthetics comparing to propofol alone for patient of painless arfificial abortion.
Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Anesthesia, Ephedrine, Abortion, Bolus (digestion), Heart rate, Target controlled infusion