2011Inner Mongolia Medical JournalRequires access

Comparison of Sotalol Therapy with Propafenone Therapy in the Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Ding Ping

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotalol therapy,compared with propafenone therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Methods:In a multicentre,randomized,parallel controlled trial,138 cases of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after 2 weeks washout period,were randomly divided into the sotalol group(twice daily doses from 80 mg / day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose of 320 mg/day.n=68) and propafenone group(three times a day,the dose from 450 mg/day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose does not exceed 800 mg/day.n=70),The primary endpoint was to evaluate the total successful response rate to treatment at the end of 12 week treatment.Results:The randomized,parallel-group treatment of the total successful response rate to treatment of 12 weeks were 72.06% in the sotalol therapy group and 62.86% in in the propafenone therapy group,respectively.There were statistically significant difference between the sotalol therapy group and the propafenone therapy groups(P0.01).Adverse events rates were 8.82% in the sotalol therapy group and 18.57% in the propafenone group(P0.01).Conclusion:Sotalol in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with curative effect is obvious better than propafenone,and has the advantages of good safety

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotalol therapy,compared with propafenone therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Methods:In a multicentre,randomized,parallel controlled trial,138 cases of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after 2 weeks washout period,were randomly divided into the sotalol group(twice daily doses from 80 mg / day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose of 320 mg/day.n=68) and propafenone group(three times a day,the dose from 450 mg/day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose does not exceed 800 mg/day.n=70),The primary endpoint was to evaluate the total successful response rate to treatment at the end of 12 week treatment.Results:The randomized,parallel-group treatment of the total successful response rate to treatment of 12 weeks were 72.06% in the sotalol therapy group and 62.86% in in the propafenone therapy group,respectively.There were statistically significant difference between the sotalol therapy group and the propafenone therapy groups(P0.01).Adverse events rates were 8.82% in the sotalol therapy group and 18.57% in the propafenone group(P0.01).Conclusion:Sotalol in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with curative effect is obvious better than propafenone,and has the advantages of good safety

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotalol therapy,compared with propafenone therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Methods:In a multicentre,randomized,parallel controlled trial,138 cases of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after 2 weeks washout period,were randomly divided into the sotalol group(twice daily doses from 80 mg / day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose of 320 mg/day.n=68) and propafenone group(three times a day,the dose from 450 mg/day,depending on the circumstances,the amount increasing,the maximum dose does not exceed 800 mg/day.n=70),The primary endpoint was to evaluate the total successful response rate to treatment at the end of 12 week treatment.Results:The randomized,parallel-group treatment of the total successful response rate to treatment of 12 weeks were 72.06% in the sotalol therapy group and 62.86% in in the propafenone therapy group,respectively.There were statistically significant difference between the sotalol therapy group and the propafenone therapy groups(P0.01).Adverse events rates were 8.82% in the sotalol therapy group and 18.57% in the propafenone group(P0.01).Conclusion:Sotalol in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with curative effect is obvious better than propafenone,and has the advantages of good safety

Key concepts: Propafenone, Medicine, Sotalol, Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Atrial fibrillation, Anesthesia, Randomized controlled trial, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Sotalol Therapy with Propafenone Therapy in the Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation — Research Paper | ScholarLens