1992•PubMedRequires access

[Efficacy of intravenous and per os propafenone in the ambulatory treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation].

Massimo Margheri, Giuseppe A. Fradella, Mauro Maioli, Marco Paterni, Paolo Bartoli, Francesco Bonechi, A Brandinelli, Felice Mazza, Marco Sansoni, ANDREA ZIPOLI

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Propafenone efficacy in conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm has been well documented. In this study we considered propafenone efficacy according to a graduated protocol of administration. Forty-two patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation, without left ventricular failure, ischemic symptoms and in absence of antiarrhythmical treatment, were treated according to the following protocol: propafenone 1 mg/kg i.v. (5 min) followed, in the non-responder patient group, by a second dose, 0.5 mg/kg i.v. (15 min). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation received 900 mg/daily of propafenone per os, at home for two days. Thereafter, patients still not restored to sinus rhythm were considered non-responders. Patients who were converted to sinus rhythm received 450 mg daily of the drug (oral administration), at home, as antiarrhythmical prophylaxis, for three months. Thirty-nine patients were converted to sinus rhythm (92.8%), 24 of them after intravenous propafenone (57.2%), and the other 15 (35.6%) after oral administration of the drug. The average heart rate in patients not converted to sinus rhythm with intravenous propafenone was significantly reduced after drug administration, compared to basal values (from 136.4 +/- 18.1 to 107.1 +/- 17.6, p < 0.01), allowing home treatment. No major cardiac effects were observed after infusion, nor after oral administration of propafenone. During a three-month follow-up we observed 3 cases of relapsed atrial fibrillation and 2 discontinued treatments due to minor gastroenteric side effects. In conclusion, propafenone therapy in ambulatory regimen is safe and effective in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. In many patients refractory to IV treatment, further therapeutic success may be achieved following oral propafenone administration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Propafenone efficacy in conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm has been well documented. In this study we considered propafenone efficacy according to a graduated protocol of administration. Forty-two patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation, without left ventricular failure, ischemic symptoms and in absence of antiarrhythmical treatment, were treated according to the following protocol: propafenone 1 mg/kg i.v. (5 min) followed, in the non-responder patient group, by a second dose, 0.5 mg/kg i.v. (15 min). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation received 900 mg/daily of propafenone per os, at home for two days. Thereafter, patients still not restored to sinus rhythm were considered non-responders. Patients who were converted to sinus rhythm received 450 mg daily of the drug (oral administration), at home, as antiarrhythmical prophylaxis, for three months. Thirty-nine patients were converted to sinus rhythm (92.8%), 24 of them after intravenous propafenone (57.2%), and the other 15 (35.6%) after oral administration of the drug. The average heart rate in patients not converted to sinus rhythm with intravenous propafenone was significantly reduced after drug administration, compared to basal values (from 136.4 +/- 18.1 to 107.1 +/- 17.6, p < 0.01), allowing home treatment. No major cardiac effects were observed after infusion, nor after oral administration of propafenone. During a three-month follow-up we observed 3 cases of relapsed atrial fibrillation and 2 discontinued treatments due to minor gastroenteric side effects. In conclusion, propafenone therapy in ambulatory regimen is safe and effective in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. In many patients refractory to IV treatment, further therapeutic success may be achieved following oral propafenone administration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Propafenone efficacy in conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm has been well documented. In this study we considered propafenone efficacy according to a graduated protocol of administration. Forty-two patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation, without left ventricular failure, ischemic symptoms and in absence of antiarrhythmical treatment, were treated according to the following protocol: propafenone 1 mg/kg i.v. (5 min) followed, in the non-responder patient group, by a second dose, 0.5 mg/kg i.v. (15 min). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation received 900 mg/daily of propafenone per os, at home for two days. Thereafter, patients still not restored to sinus rhythm were considered non-responders. Patients who were converted to sinus rhythm received 450 mg daily of the drug (oral administration), at home, as antiarrhythmical prophylaxis, for three months. Thirty-nine patients were converted to sinus rhythm (92.8%), 24 of them after intravenous propafenone (57.2%), and the other 15 (35.6%) after oral administration of the drug. The average heart rate in patients not converted to sinus rhythm with intravenous propafenone was significantly reduced after drug administration, compared to basal values (from 136.4 +/- 18.1 to 107.1 +/- 17.6, p < 0.01), allowing home treatment. No major cardiac effects were observed after infusion, nor after oral administration of propafenone. During a three-month follow-up we observed 3 cases of relapsed atrial fibrillation and 2 discontinued treatments due to minor gastroenteric side effects. In conclusion, propafenone therapy in ambulatory regimen is safe and effective in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. In many patients refractory to IV treatment, further therapeutic success may be achieved following oral propafenone administration.

Key concepts: Propafenone, Medicine, Atrial fibrillation, Sinus rhythm, Ambulatory, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Regimen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Efficacy of intravenous and per os propafenone in the ambulatory treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens