1996•PubMedRequires access

[Propafenone and sotalol: long-term efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A placebo-controlled double-blind study].

Francesco Bellandi, Dabizzi Rp, Luigi Niccoli, Federico Cantini, R Palchetti

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a relatively frequent atrial arrhythmias activated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: To assess the propafenone and sotalol efficacy in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FA) we enrolled, in a double blind placebo controlled study over 1 year, 300 patients (168 males); mean age 52.3 +/- 17.2 years, randomized to receive orally, three times daily, either propafenone (mean daily dose of 13 +/- 1.5 mg/Kg; Group A: 102 patients) or sotalol (mean daily dose of 3 +/- 0.4 mg/Kg; Group B: 106 patients) or placebo (Group C: 92 patients). All subjects experienced in previous 12 months at least 4 FA episodes. During follow-up we considered atrial tachyarrhythmia (TAA) onset: FA recurrences and/or the onset of atrial flutter (FIA). Three patients (3%) of Group A and 5 (5%) of Group B interrupted therapy for side effects; 5 patients (5.5%) of Group C with supraventricular tachycardia interrupted the double blind therapy; 11 were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Of the remaining 276 patients, TAA were observed in 43 (44.8%) of 96 patients in Group A, 28 (29.5%) of 95 patients in Group B and 62 (72.9%) of 85 patients in Group C. TAA were significantly less in A and B groups than in Group C (p < 0.005); a significant TAA reduction was also observed in patients treated with sotalol compared with those treated with propafenone (p < 0.05). TAA were: FA-118 (88.7%) and FIA-15 (11.3%). The arrhythmia free time was significantly shorter in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Sotalol seems to be more effective than propafenone and therefore represents a valid alternative for FA prevention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a relatively frequent atrial arrhythmias activated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: To assess the propafenone and sotalol efficacy in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FA) we enrolled, in a double blind placebo controlled study over 1 year, 300 patients (168 males); mean age 52.3 +/- 17.2 years, randomized to receive orally, three times daily, either propafenone (mean daily dose of 13 +/- 1.5 mg/Kg; Group A: 102 patients) or sotalol (mean daily dose of 3 +/- 0.4 mg/Kg; Group B: 106 patients) or placebo (Group C: 92 patients). All subjects experienced in previous 12 months at least 4 FA episodes. During follow-up we considered atrial tachyarrhythmia (TAA) onset: FA recurrences and/or the onset of atrial flutter (FIA). Three patients (3%) of Group A and 5 (5%) of Group B interrupted therapy for side effects; 5 patients (5.5%) of Group C with supraventricular tachycardia interrupted the double blind therapy; 11 were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Of the remaining 276 patients, TAA were observed in 43 (44.8%) of 96 patients in Group A, 28 (29.5%) of 95 patients in Group B and 62 (72.9%) of 85 patients in Group C. TAA were significantly less in A and B groups than in Group C (p < 0.005); a significant TAA reduction was also observed in patients treated with sotalol compared with those treated with propafenone (p < 0.05). TAA were: FA-118 (88.7%) and FIA-15 (11.3%). The arrhythmia free time was significantly shorter in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Sotalol seems to be more effective than propafenone and therefore represents a valid alternative for FA prevention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a relatively frequent atrial arrhythmias activated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: To assess the propafenone and sotalol efficacy in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FA) we enrolled, in a double blind placebo controlled study over 1 year, 300 patients (168 males); mean age 52.3 +/- 17.2 years, randomized to receive orally, three times daily, either propafenone (mean daily dose of 13 +/- 1.5 mg/Kg; Group A: 102 patients) or sotalol (mean daily dose of 3 +/- 0.4 mg/Kg; Group B: 106 patients) or placebo (Group C: 92 patients). All subjects experienced in previous 12 months at least 4 FA episodes. During follow-up we considered atrial tachyarrhythmia (TAA) onset: FA recurrences and/or the onset of atrial flutter (FIA). Three patients (3%) of Group A and 5 (5%) of Group B interrupted therapy for side effects; 5 patients (5.5%) of Group C with supraventricular tachycardia interrupted the double blind therapy; 11 were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Of the remaining 276 patients, TAA were observed in 43 (44.8%) of 96 patients in Group A, 28 (29.5%) of 95 patients in Group B and 62 (72.9%) of 85 patients in Group C. TAA were significantly less in A and B groups than in Group C (p < 0.005); a significant TAA reduction was also observed in patients treated with sotalol compared with those treated with propafenone (p < 0.05). TAA were: FA-118 (88.7%) and FIA-15 (11.3%). The arrhythmia free time was significantly shorter in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Sotalol seems to be more effective than propafenone and therefore represents a valid alternative for FA prevention.

Key concepts: Medicine, Propafenone, Sotalol, Atrial fibrillation, Internal medicine, Placebo, Atrial flutter, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Propafenone and sotalol: long-term efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A placebo-controlled double-blind study]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens