Relative bioavailability of zaleplon dispersible tablets in healthy human subjects
Jian Liu
Abstract
Jian Liu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the relative bioavailability of zaleplon dispersible tablets in healthy human subjects. METHODS In a randomized crossover study, 20 healthy male volunteers were given a single oral dose of 20 mg zaleplon dispersible tablets or capsules. Zaleplon in plasma were determined by a RP-HPLC. RESULTS After administration of the dispersible tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were: C max ( 63.6± 14.7) and ( 61.9± 16.0) μg·L -1, T max ( 0.9± 0.4) and ( 1.0± 0.4) h, T 1/2 ( 0.96± 0.09) and ( 0.92± 0.10) h,AUC 0-6 h ( 156.4± 42.8) and ( 151.4± 42.8) μg·h·L -1, AUC 0-∞ were ( 160.9± 46.6) and ( 155.4± 46.0) μg·h·L -1, respectively. The relative bioavailability of dispersible tablets was ( 105.4± 20.0)%. CONCLUSION There is no significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the two preparations. It is demonstrated that the two preparations are bioequivalent by two one-side t tests.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE To study the relative bioavailability of zaleplon dispersible tablets in healthy human subjects. METHODS In a randomized crossover study, 20 healthy male volunteers were given a single oral dose of 20 mg zaleplon dispersible tablets or capsules. Zaleplon in plasma were determined by a RP-HPLC. RESULTS After administration of the dispersible tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were: C max ( 63.6± 14.7) and ( 61.9± 16.0) μg·L -1, T max ( 0.9± 0.4) and ( 1.0± 0.4) h, T 1/2 ( 0.96± 0.09) and ( 0.92± 0.10) h,AUC 0-6 h ( 156.4± 42.8) and ( 151.4± 42.8) μg·h·L -1, AUC 0-∞ were ( 160.9± 46.6) and ( 155.4± 46.0) μg·h·L -1, respectively. The relative bioavailability of dispersible tablets was ( 105.4± 20.0)%. CONCLUSION There is no significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the two preparations. It is demonstrated that the two preparations are bioequivalent by two one-side t tests.
Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Pharmacology, Plasma concentration, Chemistry, Significant difference