2004Chinese New Drugs JournalRequires access

Study of the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers

Junde Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers. Methods:The randomized crossover and self-control study was conducted in 20 healthy volunteers. They were treated with a single oral dose of 10 mg zaleplon tablets or a single oral dose of control drug (zaleplon capsules) and the blood drug concentrations were measured by HPLC equipped with a fluorescence detector. Results: The mean Cmax was (35. 01±9. 30)μg·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (34.63±12.75) μg·L-1 for control;mean Tmax was (0.72±0.40)h for zaleplon tablets and (0.73±0. 30) h for control; mean t1/2 was (1. 04±0.21) h for zaleplon tablets and (1. 09±0.39) h for control; AUC0-t was (75.31±26.35)μg·h·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (74. 54±37.13)μg·h·L-1 for con- trol. The relative bioavailability of zaleplon tablets was (105. 94±17. 69) % and no significant differ-ences between these pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. Conclusion: The bioavailability of zaleplon tablets is equivalent to that of control drug (zaleplon capsule).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers. Methods:The randomized crossover and self-control study was conducted in 20 healthy volunteers. They were treated with a single oral dose of 10 mg zaleplon tablets or a single oral dose of control drug (zaleplon capsules) and the blood drug concentrations were measured by HPLC equipped with a fluorescence detector. Results: The mean Cmax was (35. 01±9. 30)μg·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (34.63±12.75) μg·L-1 for control;mean Tmax was (0.72±0.40)h for zaleplon tablets and (0.73±0. 30) h for control; mean t1/2 was (1. 04±0.21) h for zaleplon tablets and (1. 09±0.39) h for control; AUC0-t was (75.31±26.35)μg·h·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (74. 54±37.13)μg·h·L-1 for con- trol. The relative bioavailability of zaleplon tablets was (105. 94±17. 69) % and no significant differ-ences between these pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. Conclusion: The bioavailability of zaleplon tablets is equivalent to that of control drug (zaleplon capsule).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers. Methods:The randomized crossover and self-control study was conducted in 20 healthy volunteers. They were treated with a single oral dose of 10 mg zaleplon tablets or a single oral dose of control drug (zaleplon capsules) and the blood drug concentrations were measured by HPLC equipped with a fluorescence detector. Results: The mean Cmax was (35. 01±9. 30)μg·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (34.63±12.75) μg·L-1 for control;mean Tmax was (0.72±0.40)h for zaleplon tablets and (0.73±0. 30) h for control; mean t1/2 was (1. 04±0.21) h for zaleplon tablets and (1. 09±0.39) h for control; AUC0-t was (75.31±26.35)μg·h·L-1 for zaleplon tablets and (74. 54±37.13)μg·h·L-1 for con- trol. The relative bioavailability of zaleplon tablets was (105. 94±17. 69) % and no significant differ-ences between these pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. Conclusion: The bioavailability of zaleplon tablets is equivalent to that of control drug (zaleplon capsule).

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Cmax, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Pharmacology, Medicine, Capsule

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens