2003Chinese Journal of Hospital PharmacyRequires access

Bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers

Yu Wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers.METHODS The drug concentrations in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography RP(HPLC RP) method following a single oral dose of 15 mg of tested zaleplon tablets and reference zaleplon capsules given respectively to 20 healthy male volunteers in an open randomized crossover design. The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated on the basis of compartment models by using 3p97 program to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two dosage forms.RESULTS The concentration time curves of the two dosage forms were fitted to one compartment model with oral absorption. AUC 0-8 of the tested drug and reference drug were ( 123.6 ± 25.6 ) μg·L -1 ·h and( 128.6 ± 29.0 ) μg·L -1 ·h, C max were ( 55.9 ± 16.2 ) μg·L -1 and ( 61.6 ± 16.7 ) μg·L -1 , T peak were ( 1.0 ± 0.3 ) h and ( 0.99 ± 0.22 ) h, T 1/2ke were ( 1.00 ± 0.29 ) h and ( 0.93 ± 0.13 ) h, respectively.These main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained showed no statistically significant difference between two products ( P 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS Both preparations are bioequivalent.The relative bioavailability of the tested tablet to reference capsule is ( 97.7 ± 14.5 )%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers.METHODS The drug concentrations in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography RP(HPLC RP) method following a single oral dose of 15 mg of tested zaleplon tablets and reference zaleplon capsules given respectively to 20 healthy male volunteers in an open randomized crossover design. The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated on the basis of compartment models by using 3p97 program to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two dosage forms.RESULTS The concentration time curves of the two dosage forms were fitted to one compartment model with oral absorption. AUC 0-8 of the tested drug and reference drug were ( 123.6 ± 25.6 ) μg·L -1 ·h and( 128.6 ± 29.0 ) μg·L -1 ·h, C max were ( 55.9 ± 16.2 ) μg·L -1 and ( 61.6 ± 16.7 ) μg·L -1 , T peak were ( 1.0 ± 0.3 ) h and ( 0.99 ± 0.22 ) h, T 1/2ke were ( 1.00 ± 0.29 ) h and ( 0.93 ± 0.13 ) h, respectively.These main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained showed no statistically significant difference between two products ( P 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS Both preparations are bioequivalent.The relative bioavailability of the tested tablet to reference capsule is ( 97.7 ± 14.5 )%.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers.METHODS The drug concentrations in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography RP(HPLC RP) method following a single oral dose of 15 mg of tested zaleplon tablets and reference zaleplon capsules given respectively to 20 healthy male volunteers in an open randomized crossover design. The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated on the basis of compartment models by using 3p97 program to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two dosage forms.RESULTS The concentration time curves of the two dosage forms were fitted to one compartment model with oral absorption. AUC 0-8 of the tested drug and reference drug were ( 123.6 ± 25.6 ) μg·L -1 ·h and( 128.6 ± 29.0 ) μg·L -1 ·h, C max were ( 55.9 ± 16.2 ) μg·L -1 and ( 61.6 ± 16.7 ) μg·L -1 , T peak were ( 1.0 ± 0.3 ) h and ( 0.99 ± 0.22 ) h, T 1/2ke were ( 1.00 ± 0.29 ) h and ( 0.93 ± 0.13 ) h, respectively.These main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained showed no statistically significant difference between two products ( P 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS Both preparations are bioequivalent.The relative bioavailability of the tested tablet to reference capsule is ( 97.7 ± 14.5 )%.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Crossover study, Capsule, High-performance liquid chromatography, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence of zaleplon tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens