2008Modern Digestion & InterventionRequires access

A clinical analysis and evaluation of in 360 cases with one-man colonoscopy

Xiu Bao-zh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To summarize the technique of one-man colonoscopy. Method The data of one-man colonoscopy and two-men colonoscopy on 360 patients were comparatively analyzed. Results The success rate of one-man colonoscopy was up to 96.9%, while two-men colonoscopy was 85.5%. The rate of reaching the end of ileum by one-man colonoscopy was 85%, and that of two-men colonoscopy was 56.0%. Eight minutes and eight seconds were spent for one-man colonoscopy to reach ileocecus on average, which was faster than two-men colonoscopy(11.5 minutes on average). The incidence of complication caused by two-men colonoscopy was 0%, whereas two-men colonoscopy was 0.88%. All results of one-man colonoscopy were superior to those of the control group. Conclusion One-man colonoscopy is not only time-saving and manpower-saving, but also safe and efficient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To summarize the technique of one-man colonoscopy. Method The data of one-man colonoscopy and two-men colonoscopy on 360 patients were comparatively analyzed. Results The success rate of one-man colonoscopy was up to 96.9%, while two-men colonoscopy was 85.5%. The rate of reaching the end of ileum by one-man colonoscopy was 85%, and that of two-men colonoscopy was 56.0%. Eight minutes and eight seconds were spent for one-man colonoscopy to reach ileocecus on average, which was faster than two-men colonoscopy(11.5 minutes on average). The incidence of complication caused by two-men colonoscopy was 0%, whereas two-men colonoscopy was 0.88%. All results of one-man colonoscopy were superior to those of the control group. Conclusion One-man colonoscopy is not only time-saving and manpower-saving, but also safe and efficient.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To summarize the technique of one-man colonoscopy. Method The data of one-man colonoscopy and two-men colonoscopy on 360 patients were comparatively analyzed. Results The success rate of one-man colonoscopy was up to 96.9%, while two-men colonoscopy was 85.5%. The rate of reaching the end of ileum by one-man colonoscopy was 85%, and that of two-men colonoscopy was 56.0%. Eight minutes and eight seconds were spent for one-man colonoscopy to reach ileocecus on average, which was faster than two-men colonoscopy(11.5 minutes on average). The incidence of complication caused by two-men colonoscopy was 0%, whereas two-men colonoscopy was 0.88%. All results of one-man colonoscopy were superior to those of the control group. Conclusion One-man colonoscopy is not only time-saving and manpower-saving, but also safe and efficient.

Key concepts: Colonoscopy, Medicine, Incidence (geometry), General surgery, Complication, Surgery, Colorectal cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A clinical analysis and evaluation of in 360 cases with one-man colonoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens