2013Digestive EndoscopyRequires access

Double‐balloon colonoscopy carried out by a trainee after incomplete conventional colonoscopy

Daiki Nemoto, Noriyuki Isohata, Kenichi Utano, Shungo Endo, David G. Hewett, Kazutomo Togashi

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been reported that double-balloon colonoscopy (DBC) is useful for patients after failed colonoscopy. In most cases previously reported, expert colonoscopists have carried out DBC. However, DBC may not require significant expertise. The objective of the present study is to assess DBC carried out by an inexperienced colonoscopist in patients referred after previously incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: In a single center between June 2011 and September 2012, we enrolled 28 consecutive patients referred following incomplete conventional colonoscopy. The reported reasons for previous failed colonoscopy were severe pain during the procedure in 15, long redundant colon in 13 and sigmoid fixation in eight. Under instruction by an experienced colonoscopist, all procedures were carried out by a gastroenterology trainee with little colonoscopy experience. A double-balloon instrument with carbon dioxide insufflation was used under fluoroscopic guidance, with i.v. sedation. Cecal intubation rate, time to cecum and patient-reported pain using a visual analog scale (0 to 10) were evaluated. RESULTS: The trainee achieved a cecal intubation in all patients (100%) without primary involvement by the experienced colonoscopist. Time to cecum ranged from 6 min to 66 min (median time to cecum 15 min 55 s). No patients required additional sedation. Visual analogue pain scores ranged from 0/10 to 10/10 (median score 2.5/10). There were no complications. CONCLUSION: DBC may enable inexperienced colonoscopists to achieve total colonoscopy after previously incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been reported that double-balloon colonoscopy (DBC) is useful for patients after failed colonoscopy. In most cases previously reported, expert colonoscopists have carried out DBC. However, DBC may not require significant expertise. The objective of the present study is to assess DBC carried out by an inexperienced colonoscopist in patients referred after previously incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: In a single center between June 2011 and September 2012, we enrolled 28 consecutive patients referred following incomplete conventional colonoscopy. The reported reasons for previous failed colonoscopy were severe pain during the procedure in 15, long redundant colon in 13 and sigmoid fixation in eight. Under instruction by an experienced colonoscopist, all procedures were carried out by a gastroenterology trainee with little colonoscopy experience. A double-balloon instrument with carbon dioxide insufflation was used under fluoroscopic guidance, with i.v. sedation. Cecal intubation rate, time to cecum and patient-reported pain using a visual analog scale (0 to 10) were evaluated. RESULTS: The trainee achieved a cecal intubation in all patients (100%) without primary involvement by the experienced colonoscopist. Time to cecum ranged from 6 min to 66 min (median time to cecum 15 min 55 s). No patients required additional sedation. Visual analogue pain scores ranged from 0/10 to 10/10 (median score 2.5/10). There were no complications. CONCLUSION: DBC may enable inexperienced colonoscopists to achieve total colonoscopy after previously incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been reported that double-balloon colonoscopy (DBC) is useful for patients after failed colonoscopy. In most cases previously reported, expert colonoscopists have carried out DBC. However, DBC may not require significant expertise. The objective of the present study is to assess DBC carried out by an inexperienced colonoscopist in patients referred after previously incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: In a single center between June 2011 and September 2012, we enrolled 28 consecutive patients referred following incomplete conventional colonoscopy. The reported reasons for previous failed colonoscopy were severe pain during the procedure in 15, long redundant colon in 13 and sigmoid fixation in eight. Under instruction by an experienced colonoscopist, all procedures were carried out by a gastroenterology trainee with little colonoscopy experience. A double-balloon instrument with carbon dioxide insufflation was used under fluoroscopic guidance, with i.v. sedation. Cecal intubation rate, time to cecum and patient-reported pain using a visual analog scale (0 to 10) were evaluated. RESULTS: The trainee achieved a cecal intubation in all patients (100%) without primary involvement by the experienced colonoscopist. Time to cecum ranged from 6 min to 66 min (median time to cecum 15 min 55 s). No patients required additional sedation. Visual analogue pain scores ranged from 0/10 to 10/10 (median score 2.5/10). There were no complications. CONCLUSION: DBC may enable inexperienced colonoscopists to achieve total colonoscopy after previously incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Key concepts: Colonoscopy, Medicine, Cecum, Sedation, Intubation, Visual analogue scale, Balloon, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double‐balloon colonoscopy carried out by a trainee after incomplete conventional colonoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens