2004Journal of Internal Intensive MedicineRequires access

Clinical Observation on Urapidil in Treatment of 68 Cases With Hypertensive Emergency

Zhang Da

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous Urapidil Hydrochloride injection in treatment of hypertensive emergency. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with hypertensive emergency were randomly divided into two groups, blood pressure and heart rate were observed 0.5,1,3,6,9,12,18 and 24 hours after intravenous Sodium Nitroprusside or Urapidil Hydrochloride injection respectively. Results: The blood pressure in two groups was significantly decreased 30 minutes after intravenous infusion(P 0.01), the heart rate of patients in Sodium Nitroprusside group was obviously increased (P 0.01), while the heart rate of patients in Urapidil Hydrochloride group showed no significant change. Blood pressure of patients in both groups achieved goal value one hour after intravenous infusion. Conclusion: Continuous intravenous infusion of Urapidil Hydrochloride is effective and safe, and it can be considered as the first choice in treating patients with hypertensive emergency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous Urapidil Hydrochloride injection in treatment of hypertensive emergency. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with hypertensive emergency were randomly divided into two groups, blood pressure and heart rate were observed 0.5,1,3,6,9,12,18 and 24 hours after intravenous Sodium Nitroprusside or Urapidil Hydrochloride injection respectively. Results: The blood pressure in two groups was significantly decreased 30 minutes after intravenous infusion(P 0.01), the heart rate of patients in Sodium Nitroprusside group was obviously increased (P 0.01), while the heart rate of patients in Urapidil Hydrochloride group showed no significant change. Blood pressure of patients in both groups achieved goal value one hour after intravenous infusion. Conclusion: Continuous intravenous infusion of Urapidil Hydrochloride is effective and safe, and it can be considered as the first choice in treating patients with hypertensive emergency.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous Urapidil Hydrochloride injection in treatment of hypertensive emergency. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with hypertensive emergency were randomly divided into two groups, blood pressure and heart rate were observed 0.5,1,3,6,9,12,18 and 24 hours after intravenous Sodium Nitroprusside or Urapidil Hydrochloride injection respectively. Results: The blood pressure in two groups was significantly decreased 30 minutes after intravenous infusion(P 0.01), the heart rate of patients in Sodium Nitroprusside group was obviously increased (P 0.01), while the heart rate of patients in Urapidil Hydrochloride group showed no significant change. Blood pressure of patients in both groups achieved goal value one hour after intravenous infusion. Conclusion: Continuous intravenous infusion of Urapidil Hydrochloride is effective and safe, and it can be considered as the first choice in treating patients with hypertensive emergency.

Key concepts: Urapidil, Medicine, Sodium nitroprusside, Blood pressure, Anesthesia, Heart rate, Hypertensive emergency, Hydrochloride

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Observation on Urapidil in Treatment of 68 Cases With Hypertensive Emergency — Research Paper | ScholarLens