The Anti-Unfair Competition Law's Protection and Restriction on Intellectual Property
Jin Xiao-hong
Abstract
Jin Xiao-hong
Abstract
There have been many statements about the relationship between the anti-unfair competition law and the intellectual property law, most of which focus on the issue of Which includes which. This article tries to start with the localization of the legislation of property title, discussing the original impact of the reverse and obligation legislation on anti-unfair competition law. Outside the right, anti-unfair competition law makes the restriction to the abuse of intellectual property law. Hereby the combination of the two laws will effectively prevent the intellectual property law from being incomplete and find an equation point among the obligees, competitors and the public.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There have been many statements about the relationship between the anti-unfair competition law and the intellectual property law, most of which focus on the issue of Which includes which. This article tries to start with the localization of the legislation of property title, discussing the original impact of the reverse and obligation legislation on anti-unfair competition law. Outside the right, anti-unfair competition law makes the restriction to the abuse of intellectual property law. Hereby the combination of the two laws will effectively prevent the intellectual property law from being incomplete and find an equation point among the obligees, competitors and the public.
Key concepts: Intellectual property, Unfair competition, Legislation, Law, Competition law, Competitor analysis, Competition (biology), Law and economics