2011Experimental and Laboratory MedicineRequires access

The comparative study on the testing results between OYLMPUS AU600 and Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer

DI Yon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the comparability of the testing results obtained from different biochemistry equipments and clear the possibility of its clinical acceptability.Methods According to the acceptable error in CLSI EP5-A and EP9-A,the precision estimation for the two biochemical equipments were made.The detection system was adopted as the target system(X) which was composed of OYLMPUS AU600 automatic biochemistry analyzer,meanwhile,Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer was used as evaluated system(Y).Two kinds of control sera(normal and abnormal) were analyzed in eight working days and eighty fresh serum samples were inspected in these days including six biochemical items(BUN,CR,UA,AST,CK,LDH).The relative deviation between the two detection systems was calculated.The comparability of testing results obtained from different equipments was evaluated according to the CLIA′88 standard.Results The systemic errors on most of the results between OYLMPUS AU600 and Dimension Xpand plus were clinically acceptable except individual items including BUN and UA.Conclusions Most of the results tested by two analysis systems are comparable and able to attain the clinical demand,and the reliable results can also be provided by Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the comparability of the testing results obtained from different biochemistry equipments and clear the possibility of its clinical acceptability.Methods According to the acceptable error in CLSI EP5-A and EP9-A,the precision estimation for the two biochemical equipments were made.The detection system was adopted as the target system(X) which was composed of OYLMPUS AU600 automatic biochemistry analyzer,meanwhile,Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer was used as evaluated system(Y).Two kinds of control sera(normal and abnormal) were analyzed in eight working days and eighty fresh serum samples were inspected in these days including six biochemical items(BUN,CR,UA,AST,CK,LDH).The relative deviation between the two detection systems was calculated.The comparability of testing results obtained from different equipments was evaluated according to the CLIA′88 standard.Results The systemic errors on most of the results between OYLMPUS AU600 and Dimension Xpand plus were clinically acceptable except individual items including BUN and UA.Conclusions Most of the results tested by two analysis systems are comparable and able to attain the clinical demand,and the reliable results can also be provided by Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the comparability of the testing results obtained from different biochemistry equipments and clear the possibility of its clinical acceptability.Methods According to the acceptable error in CLSI EP5-A and EP9-A,the precision estimation for the two biochemical equipments were made.The detection system was adopted as the target system(X) which was composed of OYLMPUS AU600 automatic biochemistry analyzer,meanwhile,Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer was used as evaluated system(Y).Two kinds of control sera(normal and abnormal) were analyzed in eight working days and eighty fresh serum samples were inspected in these days including six biochemical items(BUN,CR,UA,AST,CK,LDH).The relative deviation between the two detection systems was calculated.The comparability of testing results obtained from different equipments was evaluated according to the CLIA′88 standard.Results The systemic errors on most of the results between OYLMPUS AU600 and Dimension Xpand plus were clinically acceptable except individual items including BUN and UA.Conclusions Most of the results tested by two analysis systems are comparable and able to attain the clinical demand,and the reliable results can also be provided by Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer.

Key concepts: Spectrum analyzer, Comparability, Clinical biochemistry, Dimension (graph theory), Relative standard deviation, Computer science, Mathematics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparative study on the testing results between OYLMPUS AU600 and Dimension Xpand plus automatic biochemistry analyzer — Research Paper | ScholarLens