Clinical Effects and Prognostic Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy and Arteriovenous Thrombolysis in Treatment of Acute Cerebral Infarction
Lei Jian-min
Abstract
Lei Jian-min
Abstract
Objective To analyze the clinical effect and prognosis of mechanical thrombectomy and arteriovenous thrombolysis in treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 96 patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted during January 2012 and January 2014 were randomly divided into control group( n = 48) and observation group( n = 48). The control group was given arteriovenous thrombolysis therapy,while the observation group was given mechanical thrombectomy therapy. Results The total efficiency rate of the observation group was obviously higher than that of the control group( P 0. 05). The postoperative recanalization rate and the residual stenosis rate( ≤30%) of the observation group were obviously higher than those of the control group( P 0. 05). There were no significant differences in intracranial hemorrhage rate and mortality rate of postoperative 3 months between the two groups( P 0. 05). Conclusion The clinical effect and prognosis of mechanical thrombectomy in treatment of acute cerebral infarction are significantly better than those of arteriovenous thrombolysis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To analyze the clinical effect and prognosis of mechanical thrombectomy and arteriovenous thrombolysis in treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 96 patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted during January 2012 and January 2014 were randomly divided into control group( n = 48) and observation group( n = 48). The control group was given arteriovenous thrombolysis therapy,while the observation group was given mechanical thrombectomy therapy. Results The total efficiency rate of the observation group was obviously higher than that of the control group( P 0. 05). The postoperative recanalization rate and the residual stenosis rate( ≤30%) of the observation group were obviously higher than those of the control group( P 0. 05). There were no significant differences in intracranial hemorrhage rate and mortality rate of postoperative 3 months between the two groups( P 0. 05). Conclusion The clinical effect and prognosis of mechanical thrombectomy in treatment of acute cerebral infarction are significantly better than those of arteriovenous thrombolysis.
Key concepts: Thrombolysis, Medicine, Cerebral infarction, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Myocardial infarction, Ischemia