2014•China Practical MedicineRequires access
Comparison and research on supperselected intraaterial thrombolysis and venous thrombolysis in treating acute cerebral infarction
Li B
Open publisher page 0 citations
Abstract
Objective To comparison and research the clinical effect and security of supperselected intraaterial thrombolysis and venous thrombolysis in treating acute cerebral infarction.Methods 76 patients with acute cerebral infarction in our department were randomLy divided into experimental group(38 case)and control group(38 case).The supperselected intraaterial thrombolysis with urokinase were applied in experimental groups,the venous thrombolysis were applied in control group.Comparing the NIHSS score after their treatment in different time and the total effective rate after 30 days.ResultsThe NIHSS score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group after their treatment in 30min、12 h、1 d、3 d、7 d、14 d later,the difference between the two groups is significantly(P0.05).The total effective rate of the experimental group was 86.84%,the total effective rate of the control group was 71.05%.the total effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group,the difference between the two groups is significantly(P0.05).ConclusionThe clinical effect of supperselected intraaterial thrombolysis with urokinase is better than that of venous thrombolysis.It is worthy of widely use in treating acute cerebral infarction.