2002YankeRequires access

Corneal pachymetry measurement with ORBSCAN-II Topography System vs ultrasonic pachymetry

Xie Li

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan Ⅱ topography System vs ultrasonic pachmetry,try to find out the regularity of the difference between them.Method:The central corneal thickness of 222 patients (423 eyes) with simple refractive errors were measured with Orbscan Ⅱ topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry.The results were treated statistically and the differences were analysed.Results:Of the 423 eyes,the central corneal thickness measured with A scan was (544 52±32 43) μm,and that with Orbscan Ⅱ,(515 39±35 77)μm.The difference between them was significant (P0 05).The difference of the results between these two methods was -18~64μm,with a mean value (29 15±13 61) μm,and 54 38% was between 20~40μm.The difference in 2 eyes (0 47%) was ≥60μm;in 26 eyes (6 15%) 50~59 μm,in 65 eyes (15 37%) 40~49 μm,in 126 eyes (29 79%) 30~39 μm,in 104 eyes (24 59%) 20~29 μm,in 67 eyes (15 84%) 10~19 μm,in 24 eyes (5 67%) 0~9 μm,and 9 eyes (2 13%) less than 0 μm.Conclusion:When to measure the central corneal thickness,the value obtained with Orbscan Ⅱ topography was lower than that with ultrasonic pachymetry about 20~40 μm.Ultrasonic pachymetry is still the most accurate method in corneal pachymetry.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan Ⅱ topography System vs ultrasonic pachmetry,try to find out the regularity of the difference between them.Method:The central corneal thickness of 222 patients (423 eyes) with simple refractive errors were measured with Orbscan Ⅱ topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry.The results were treated statistically and the differences were analysed.Results:Of the 423 eyes,the central corneal thickness measured with A scan was (544 52±32 43) μm,and that with Orbscan Ⅱ,(515 39±35 77)μm.The difference between them was significant (P0 05).The difference of the results between these two methods was -18~64μm,with a mean value (29 15±13 61) μm,and 54 38% was between 20~40μm.The difference in 2 eyes (0 47%) was ≥60μm;in 26 eyes (6 15%) 50~59 μm,in 65 eyes (15 37%) 40~49 μm,in 126 eyes (29 79%) 30~39 μm,in 104 eyes (24 59%) 20~29 μm,in 67 eyes (15 84%) 10~19 μm,in 24 eyes (5 67%) 0~9 μm,and 9 eyes (2 13%) less than 0 μm.Conclusion:When to measure the central corneal thickness,the value obtained with Orbscan Ⅱ topography was lower than that with ultrasonic pachymetry about 20~40 μm.Ultrasonic pachymetry is still the most accurate method in corneal pachymetry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan Ⅱ topography System vs ultrasonic pachmetry,try to find out the regularity of the difference between them.Method:The central corneal thickness of 222 patients (423 eyes) with simple refractive errors were measured with Orbscan Ⅱ topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry.The results were treated statistically and the differences were analysed.Results:Of the 423 eyes,the central corneal thickness measured with A scan was (544 52±32 43) μm,and that with Orbscan Ⅱ,(515 39±35 77)μm.The difference between them was significant (P0 05).The difference of the results between these two methods was -18~64μm,with a mean value (29 15±13 61) μm,and 54 38% was between 20~40μm.The difference in 2 eyes (0 47%) was ≥60μm;in 26 eyes (6 15%) 50~59 μm,in 65 eyes (15 37%) 40~49 μm,in 126 eyes (29 79%) 30~39 μm,in 104 eyes (24 59%) 20~29 μm,in 67 eyes (15 84%) 10~19 μm,in 24 eyes (5 67%) 0~9 μm,and 9 eyes (2 13%) less than 0 μm.Conclusion:When to measure the central corneal thickness,the value obtained with Orbscan Ⅱ topography was lower than that with ultrasonic pachymetry about 20~40 μm.Ultrasonic pachymetry is still the most accurate method in corneal pachymetry.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ophthalmology, Significant difference, Ultrasonic sensor, Corneal topography, Corneal pachymetry, Cornea, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corneal pachymetry measurement with ORBSCAN-II Topography System vs ultrasonic pachymetry — Research Paper | ScholarLens