Comparison of corneal pachymetry using ultrasound and Orbscan-II before LASIK
Fang Zhou
Abstract
Fang Zhou
Abstract
Objective: To assess the accuracy and variability in pachymetry measurements of th e thinnest corneal thickness obtained by Orbscan-Ⅱ and by DGH ultrasound in pr imary laser in myopia.Methods: The thinnest corneal thickness in 306 healthy eyes of 161 myopic subjects were measured with Orbscan-Ⅱ and DGH ultrasound pachymetry. The results were treated statistically and the differences were analysed.Results: There was no statistical difference(independent samples test,P0.05) in corneal thickness between left eye and right eye which use Orbscan-Ⅱ or DG H ultrasound pachymetry. The mean thinnest corneal thickness was(537.83±32.7 96)μm with Orbscan-Ⅱ system,and (528.79±27.689)μm with DGH ultrasound pachymetry. There was significant difference statistically(paired sa mples test,P0.05). There were significant linear correlations betw een scan ning-slit topography and ultrasound pachymetry(r=0.926,P 0.001),the differen ce of the results between these two methods was a mean value(9.24±12.692)μm,in overall the DGH ultrasound measurements were thicker than the Orbscan-Ⅱ meas urements by a mean of (9.24±12.692)μm. This sample(306 eyes) were divided in to 4 groups according to the thinnest corneal thickness by Orbscan-Ⅱ system,gr oup 1,34 eyes with less than 500 μm. Group 2,164 eyes with 500 μm to 550 μm. Gro up 3,95 eyes with 550 μm to 600 μm;and group 4,13 eyes with more than 600 μm. Amo ng these groups the difference of the results between these two methods,group 1 was( -3.29±12.692)μm,group 2 was(6.95±11.64)μm,group 3 was(16.93±10.42)μm and g roup 4 was( 15.38±12.52)μm,there was significant difference statiastically among these gro ups of the difference of the results between these two methods(ANOVA,F=33 .13,P0.05).Conclusion: When measuring the thinnest corneal thickness,the value obtained with Orbscan-Ⅱ topography was higher than that with ultrasonic pachymetry,but t he difference of the results between these two methods is not identical amomg th ese groups based on the thinnest corneal thickness by Orbscan-Ⅱ system,specia ll y the thinnest corneal thickness was less than 500 μm by Orbscan-Ⅱ. Ultrason ic pachymetry is still the most accurate method in corneal pachymetry,but Orbsca n-Ⅱ topography system is a useful instrument for the evaluation of corneal shape an d thickness which is helpful in corneal refractive surgeries.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To assess the accuracy and variability in pachymetry measurements of th e thinnest corneal thickness obtained by Orbscan-Ⅱ and by DGH ultrasound in pr imary laser in myopia.Methods: The thinnest corneal thickness in 306 healthy eyes of 161 myopic subjects were measured with Orbscan-Ⅱ and DGH ultrasound pachymetry. The results were treated statistically and the differences were analysed.Results: There was no statistical difference(independent samples test,P0.05) in corneal thickness between left eye and right eye which use Orbscan-Ⅱ or DG H ultrasound pachymetry. The mean thinnest corneal thickness was(537.83±32.7 96)μm with Orbscan-Ⅱ system,and (528.79±27.689)μm with DGH ultrasound pachymetry. There was significant difference statistically(paired sa mples test,P0.05). There were significant linear correlations betw een scan ning-slit topography and ultrasound pachymetry(r=0.926,P 0.001),the differen ce of the results between these two methods was a mean value(9.24±12.692)μm,in overall the DGH ultrasound measurements were thicker than the Orbscan-Ⅱ meas urements by a mean of (9.24±12.692)μm. This sample(306 eyes) were divided in to 4 groups according to the thinnest corneal thickness by Orbscan-Ⅱ system,gr oup 1,34 eyes with less than 500 μm. Group 2,164 eyes with 500 μm to 550 μm. Gro up 3,95 eyes with 550 μm to 600 μm;and group 4,13 eyes with more than 600 μm. Amo ng these groups the difference of the results between these two methods,group 1 was( -3.29±12.692)μm,group 2 was(6.95±11.64)μm,group 3 was(16.93±10.42)μm and g roup 4 was( 15.38±12.52)μm,there was significant difference statiastically among these gro ups of the difference of the results between these two methods(ANOVA,F=33 .13,P0.05).Conclusion: When measuring the thinnest corneal thickness,the value obtained with Orbscan-Ⅱ topography was higher than that with ultrasonic pachymetry,but t he difference of the results between these two methods is not identical amomg th ese groups based on the thinnest corneal thickness by Orbscan-Ⅱ system,specia ll y the thinnest corneal thickness was less than 500 μm by Orbscan-Ⅱ. Ultrason ic pachymetry is still the most accurate method in corneal pachymetry,but Orbsca n-Ⅱ topography system is a useful instrument for the evaluation of corneal shape an d thickness which is helpful in corneal refractive surgeries.
Key concepts: Ophthalmology, LASIK, Medicine, Ultrasound, Significant difference, Mean difference, Optometry, Confidence interval