Comparison of central corneal thicknesses measured by Orbscan II system and Ultrasonic pachymetry in myopia
Fusheng Li
Abstract
Fusheng Li
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the corneal thinknesses measured with Orbscan Ⅱ system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Methods Two hundred myopic subjects(400eyes) were recruited and divided into four groups according to the diopter and corneal thickness measured by A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Central corneal thicknesses(CCT) were measured with Orbscan Ⅱ topography system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Results The mean CCT by Orbscan Ⅱ system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry were(568.06±34.29) μm and(536.25±33.90) μm respertively.The result of Orbscan Ⅱ system was higher than that of A-ultrasonic pachymetry with a difference of(31.81±16.39) μm(P0.01).Firstly,The subjects were divided into four groups according to diopter:low myopia(-0.50~-3.00D),medium myopia(-3.25~-6.00D),high myopia(-6.25 ~9.00D)and supermyopia(-9.25~-15.00D),The results of Orbscan Ⅱ system were higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry respectively(P0.01).Secondly,The subjects were divided into four groups based on the CCT measured by A-ultrasonic pachymetry :group1(≤500 μm),group 2(500~536 μm),group 3(536~572 μm),and group 4(≥572 μm).The results of Orbscan Ⅱ system were higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry(P0.01).Conclusions There were significant differencees between the results of these two apparatus.The outcomes of Orbscan Ⅱ system are approximately 30 μm higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Orbscan Ⅱ system cannot totally replace A-ultrasonic pachymetry.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the corneal thinknesses measured with Orbscan Ⅱ system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Methods Two hundred myopic subjects(400eyes) were recruited and divided into four groups according to the diopter and corneal thickness measured by A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Central corneal thicknesses(CCT) were measured with Orbscan Ⅱ topography system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Results The mean CCT by Orbscan Ⅱ system and A-ultrasonic pachymetry were(568.06±34.29) μm and(536.25±33.90) μm respertively.The result of Orbscan Ⅱ system was higher than that of A-ultrasonic pachymetry with a difference of(31.81±16.39) μm(P0.01).Firstly,The subjects were divided into four groups according to diopter:low myopia(-0.50~-3.00D),medium myopia(-3.25~-6.00D),high myopia(-6.25 ~9.00D)and supermyopia(-9.25~-15.00D),The results of Orbscan Ⅱ system were higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry respectively(P0.01).Secondly,The subjects were divided into four groups based on the CCT measured by A-ultrasonic pachymetry :group1(≤500 μm),group 2(500~536 μm),group 3(536~572 μm),and group 4(≥572 μm).The results of Orbscan Ⅱ system were higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry(P0.01).Conclusions There were significant differencees between the results of these two apparatus.The outcomes of Orbscan Ⅱ system are approximately 30 μm higher than those of A-ultrasonic pachymetry.Orbscan Ⅱ system cannot totally replace A-ultrasonic pachymetry.
Key concepts: Dioptre, Ultrasonic sensor, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Significant difference, Corneal pachymetry, Corneal topography, Optometry