2006Journal of Modern StomatologyRequires access

Clinical analysis of protraction in combination with traction arch for Angle III malocclusion

WU Xueme

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of different treatment timings at early mixed dentition and early permanent dentition on Angle Ⅲ malocclusion.Methods Twenty six patients with Angle Ⅲ malocclusion were selected and applied protraction in combination with traction arch for six months. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment.Results Significant changes of maxillae moving forward were observed in all 26 cases: SNA was increased 2.2°±0.3°, point A was moved forward 3.3mm±1.3mm, and maxillary center incisor was moved labially 3.8mm±1.2mm. Significant differences, more skeletal changes and less dental changes, were observed in early mixed dentition.Conclusion Protraction combined with the traction arch was a simple and effective treatment approach that plays an important role in the treatment of Angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The treatment time of early mixed dentition was more effective than that of early permanent dentition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effects of different treatment timings at early mixed dentition and early permanent dentition on Angle Ⅲ malocclusion.Methods Twenty six patients with Angle Ⅲ malocclusion were selected and applied protraction in combination with traction arch for six months. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment.Results Significant changes of maxillae moving forward were observed in all 26 cases: SNA was increased 2.2°±0.3°, point A was moved forward 3.3mm±1.3mm, and maxillary center incisor was moved labially 3.8mm±1.2mm. Significant differences, more skeletal changes and less dental changes, were observed in early mixed dentition.Conclusion Protraction combined with the traction arch was a simple and effective treatment approach that plays an important role in the treatment of Angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The treatment time of early mixed dentition was more effective than that of early permanent dentition.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of different treatment timings at early mixed dentition and early permanent dentition on Angle Ⅲ malocclusion.Methods Twenty six patients with Angle Ⅲ malocclusion were selected and applied protraction in combination with traction arch for six months. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment.Results Significant changes of maxillae moving forward were observed in all 26 cases: SNA was increased 2.2°±0.3°, point A was moved forward 3.3mm±1.3mm, and maxillary center incisor was moved labially 3.8mm±1.2mm. Significant differences, more skeletal changes and less dental changes, were observed in early mixed dentition.Conclusion Protraction combined with the traction arch was a simple and effective treatment approach that plays an important role in the treatment of Angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The treatment time of early mixed dentition was more effective than that of early permanent dentition.

Key concepts: Malocclusion, Orthodontics, Traction (geology), Maxilla, Medicine, Dentition, Incisor, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical analysis of protraction in combination with traction arch for Angle III malocclusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens