Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal preparation
LU He-pin
Abstract
LU He-pin
Abstract
Objective To assess the clinical effects of ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal preparation.Methods A total of 300 teeth which needed endodontic treatment were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups.The root canals were prepared with ProTaper NiTi instruments in ProTaper group and with K-files in K-files group respectively.The incidence of endodontic interappointment emergences(EIAE),the effects of canal obturation and incidence of the instrument fracture were compared by χ2 test.Results The incidence of EIAE(6.00%) in ProTaper group were significantly lower than that in the K-files group(26.67%)(P0.01).The rate of adequate root canal filling(93.77%) in ProTaper group were significantly higher than that in K-files group(88.64%)(P0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of instrument fracture between ProTaper group and K-files group(P0.05).Conclusions Using ProTaper NiTi instruments can reduce the incidence of EIAE and improve the effects of canal obturation.It is safe to use ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal therapy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To assess the clinical effects of ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal preparation.Methods A total of 300 teeth which needed endodontic treatment were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups.The root canals were prepared with ProTaper NiTi instruments in ProTaper group and with K-files in K-files group respectively.The incidence of endodontic interappointment emergences(EIAE),the effects of canal obturation and incidence of the instrument fracture were compared by χ2 test.Results The incidence of EIAE(6.00%) in ProTaper group were significantly lower than that in the K-files group(26.67%)(P0.01).The rate of adequate root canal filling(93.77%) in ProTaper group were significantly higher than that in K-files group(88.64%)(P0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of instrument fracture between ProTaper group and K-files group(P0.05).Conclusions Using ProTaper NiTi instruments can reduce the incidence of EIAE and improve the effects of canal obturation.It is safe to use ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal therapy.
Key concepts: Root canal, Dentistry, Nickel titanium, Significant difference, Orthodontics, Dental instruments, Medicine, Materials science