2010Heilongjiang Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical Evaluation on Automatic Nucleated Red Blood Cell Count by Blood Cell Analyzer

Chen Zhen-nan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the clue reliability of nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) by blood cell analyzer Sysmex XE-2100,and to evaluate the performance of an automatic nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) count.Methods 85 cases with NRBC clue in WBC column and 200 cases with non-NRBC from blood cell analyzer XE-2100 were collected,they were all counted by both XE-2100 automatic blood cell analyzer and manual method with microscope.Results There were 37 cases with NRBC by microscopic test in 85 cases with NRBC clue and the positive rate was 43.5%.There were 71 cases that had NRBC with one or more abnormal clues as Imm Gran,Blasts,Aty/Abn Ly and Left by analyzer test,among which 36 cases by microscopic test had NRBC and the positive rate was 50.7%.There were 200 cases with non-NRBC by analyzer test,among which two cases had NRBC by microscopic test and the false negative rate was 1.0%.In 36 cases with increased NRBC,there was a very good correlation between the manual and automatic method(r=0.974).No significant difference was observed between the counting results of two methods(P0.05).In 32 cases with increased NRBC,there was significant difference in the counting of WBC between NRBC and non-NRBC counting route by analyzer test(P0.05).Conclusion The positive rate of NRBC clue with WBC anomaly clue is better of blood cell analyzer XE-2100 than that of microscopic test,So blood cell analyzer XE-2100 has higher reliability lower false negative rate.It plays a role in sifting NRBC test.The NRBC counting by the XE-2100 was sensitive,accurate and reliable.The XE-2100 can measure the WBC accurately in sample with increased NRBC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the clue reliability of nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) by blood cell analyzer Sysmex XE-2100,and to evaluate the performance of an automatic nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) count.Methods 85 cases with NRBC clue in WBC column and 200 cases with non-NRBC from blood cell analyzer XE-2100 were collected,they were all counted by both XE-2100 automatic blood cell analyzer and manual method with microscope.Results There were 37 cases with NRBC by microscopic test in 85 cases with NRBC clue and the positive rate was 43.5%.There were 71 cases that had NRBC with one or more abnormal clues as Imm Gran,Blasts,Aty/Abn Ly and Left by analyzer test,among which 36 cases by microscopic test had NRBC and the positive rate was 50.7%.There were 200 cases with non-NRBC by analyzer test,among which two cases had NRBC by microscopic test and the false negative rate was 1.0%.In 36 cases with increased NRBC,there was a very good correlation between the manual and automatic method(r=0.974).No significant difference was observed between the counting results of two methods(P0.05).In 32 cases with increased NRBC,there was significant difference in the counting of WBC between NRBC and non-NRBC counting route by analyzer test(P0.05).Conclusion The positive rate of NRBC clue with WBC anomaly clue is better of blood cell analyzer XE-2100 than that of microscopic test,So blood cell analyzer XE-2100 has higher reliability lower false negative rate.It plays a role in sifting NRBC test.The NRBC counting by the XE-2100 was sensitive,accurate and reliable.The XE-2100 can measure the WBC accurately in sample with increased NRBC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the clue reliability of nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) by blood cell analyzer Sysmex XE-2100,and to evaluate the performance of an automatic nucleated red blood cell(NRBC) count.Methods 85 cases with NRBC clue in WBC column and 200 cases with non-NRBC from blood cell analyzer XE-2100 were collected,they were all counted by both XE-2100 automatic blood cell analyzer and manual method with microscope.Results There were 37 cases with NRBC by microscopic test in 85 cases with NRBC clue and the positive rate was 43.5%.There were 71 cases that had NRBC with one or more abnormal clues as Imm Gran,Blasts,Aty/Abn Ly and Left by analyzer test,among which 36 cases by microscopic test had NRBC and the positive rate was 50.7%.There were 200 cases with non-NRBC by analyzer test,among which two cases had NRBC by microscopic test and the false negative rate was 1.0%.In 36 cases with increased NRBC,there was a very good correlation between the manual and automatic method(r=0.974).No significant difference was observed between the counting results of two methods(P0.05).In 32 cases with increased NRBC,there was significant difference in the counting of WBC between NRBC and non-NRBC counting route by analyzer test(P0.05).Conclusion The positive rate of NRBC clue with WBC anomaly clue is better of blood cell analyzer XE-2100 than that of microscopic test,So blood cell analyzer XE-2100 has higher reliability lower false negative rate.It plays a role in sifting NRBC test.The NRBC counting by the XE-2100 was sensitive,accurate and reliable.The XE-2100 can measure the WBC accurately in sample with increased NRBC.

Key concepts: Nucleated Red Blood Cell, Spectrum analyzer, Medicine, Blood cell, Pathology, Internal medicine, Physics, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Evaluation on Automatic Nucleated Red Blood Cell Count by Blood Cell Analyzer — Research Paper | ScholarLens