2010Zhongguo linchuang baojian zazhiRequires access

Pathological analysis of Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and colposcopy biopsy

Luming Diao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP)and cervical biopsy by colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN).Methods Retrospective analyze out-patient information of 123 cases of CIN diagnosised by cervical biopsy by colposcopy,which were compared with pathological results by LEEP.Results There were 16 Chronic cervicitis,21 CIN I,40 CIN II,40 CIN III,4 early invasive carcinoma,2 Invasive carcinoma in 123 patients diagnosis by LEEP.Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 43.9%,73.8%,85.0%,respectively,and the total Coincidence rate was 67.5%.19 cases(15.5%)were in higher grade in the pathological results of colposcopic multiple biopsy than in those of LEEP,and other 21 cases(17.1%)were in lower grader.The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 4.9%.Accuracy of cervical biopsy by colposcopy on CIN II and CIN III was higher than that of CIN I.There was significant difference between them(P0.01).The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer by cervical biopsy under colposcopy in CIN III was higher than that in CIN I and CIN II(P0.05).Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP can make up the defects of cervical biopsy by colposcopy and improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the value of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP)and cervical biopsy by colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN).Methods Retrospective analyze out-patient information of 123 cases of CIN diagnosised by cervical biopsy by colposcopy,which were compared with pathological results by LEEP.Results There were 16 Chronic cervicitis,21 CIN I,40 CIN II,40 CIN III,4 early invasive carcinoma,2 Invasive carcinoma in 123 patients diagnosis by LEEP.Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 43.9%,73.8%,85.0%,respectively,and the total Coincidence rate was 67.5%.19 cases(15.5%)were in higher grade in the pathological results of colposcopic multiple biopsy than in those of LEEP,and other 21 cases(17.1%)were in lower grader.The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 4.9%.Accuracy of cervical biopsy by colposcopy on CIN II and CIN III was higher than that of CIN I.There was significant difference between them(P0.01).The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer by cervical biopsy under colposcopy in CIN III was higher than that in CIN I and CIN II(P0.05).Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP can make up the defects of cervical biopsy by colposcopy and improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the value of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP)and cervical biopsy by colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN).Methods Retrospective analyze out-patient information of 123 cases of CIN diagnosised by cervical biopsy by colposcopy,which were compared with pathological results by LEEP.Results There were 16 Chronic cervicitis,21 CIN I,40 CIN II,40 CIN III,4 early invasive carcinoma,2 Invasive carcinoma in 123 patients diagnosis by LEEP.Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 43.9%,73.8%,85.0%,respectively,and the total Coincidence rate was 67.5%.19 cases(15.5%)were in higher grade in the pathological results of colposcopic multiple biopsy than in those of LEEP,and other 21 cases(17.1%)were in lower grader.The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 4.9%.Accuracy of cervical biopsy by colposcopy on CIN II and CIN III was higher than that of CIN I.There was significant difference between them(P0.01).The missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer by cervical biopsy under colposcopy in CIN III was higher than that in CIN I and CIN II(P0.05).Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP can make up the defects of cervical biopsy by colposcopy and improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

Key concepts: Colposcopy, Medicine, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Biopsy, Cervical cancer, Loop electrosurgical excision procedure, Carcinoma in situ, Pathological

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pathological analysis of Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and colposcopy biopsy — Research Paper | ScholarLens