Analgesic Effects of Different Anesthesia Methods on Induced Abortion
MA Kai-lei
Abstract
MA Kai-lei
Abstract
Objective To investigate the curative efficacy of two kinds of analgesia in induced abortion. Methods We divided 100 cases of painless artificial abortion randomly into:propofol + fentanyl intravenous anesthesia group(Group A,50 cases)and 2% lidocaine local infiltration anesthesia group(Group B,50 patients),Operation lasting time,anesthesia score,analgesic effect and complications were observed in the two groups. Results The anesthesia success rate of Group A(50 cases,100%)was higher than that of Group B(43 cases,86.0%)(χ2=3.99, P0.05);The bleeding amount of Group A [15-30ml:5 cases(10.0%),30mL:1 case(2.0%)] was lower than that of Group B[12 cases (24.0%),6cases(12.0%)(]χ2=3.97,χ2=3.89,P0.05);There were 48 cases with obvious efficiency of cervical relaxation degree(96.0%)in Group A and 42 cases with the obvious efficiency(84.0%)in Group B ,with the efficiency of Group A significantly higher than that of Group B (χ2=3.94,P0.05). One case of artificial abortion syndrome of Group A(2.0%)and 6 cases of artificial abortion syndrome of Group B (12.0%)showed fewer cases of syndrome in the former compared with the latte(rχ2=4.25,P0.05). Conclusion Propofol + fentanyl intravenous anesthesia should be chosen for painless artificial abortion,with satisfactory results.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the curative efficacy of two kinds of analgesia in induced abortion. Methods We divided 100 cases of painless artificial abortion randomly into:propofol + fentanyl intravenous anesthesia group(Group A,50 cases)and 2% lidocaine local infiltration anesthesia group(Group B,50 patients),Operation lasting time,anesthesia score,analgesic effect and complications were observed in the two groups. Results The anesthesia success rate of Group A(50 cases,100%)was higher than that of Group B(43 cases,86.0%)(χ2=3.99, P0.05);The bleeding amount of Group A [15-30ml:5 cases(10.0%),30mL:1 case(2.0%)] was lower than that of Group B[12 cases (24.0%),6cases(12.0%)(]χ2=3.97,χ2=3.89,P0.05);There were 48 cases with obvious efficiency of cervical relaxation degree(96.0%)in Group A and 42 cases with the obvious efficiency(84.0%)in Group B ,with the efficiency of Group A significantly higher than that of Group B (χ2=3.94,P0.05). One case of artificial abortion syndrome of Group A(2.0%)and 6 cases of artificial abortion syndrome of Group B (12.0%)showed fewer cases of syndrome in the former compared with the latte(rχ2=4.25,P0.05). Conclusion Propofol + fentanyl intravenous anesthesia should be chosen for painless artificial abortion,with satisfactory results.
Key concepts: Medicine, Fentanyl, Propofol, Anesthesia, Abortion, Lidocaine, Analgesic, Group B