2013China Modern DoctorRequires access

Comparative analysis on clinical effect of laparoscopic and open myomectomy surgery

MA Mingning

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect analysis of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy myomecto my.Methods Among 66 cases of uterine fibroids patients,32 cases of laparoscopic surgery,34 cases laparotomy.Observed and compared:(1) the operative time,blood loss,and length of stay;(2) postoperative analgesia,incision Grade healing rate.Results The operative time of Laparoscopic group was significantly longer than the laparotomy group,but the laparoscopic group blood loss was significantly less than the open surgery group,postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparotomy group(P 0.05).The laparoscopic group postoperative analgesia was significantly lower than the open surgery group(P 0.05).Postoperative incision laparoscopic group Grade healing rate was slightly higher than the open surgery group,but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P 0.05).All patiens followed up for 1-2 years,laparoscopy group relapsed 2 cases,the laparotomy group recurrence five cases,the recurrence rate was significantly lower than the laparotomy group.Conclusion Laparoscopic myomectomy surgery than open the advantages surgical trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery,fewer complications,should be popularized and applied,it should be noted indications choice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effect analysis of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy myomecto my.Methods Among 66 cases of uterine fibroids patients,32 cases of laparoscopic surgery,34 cases laparotomy.Observed and compared:(1) the operative time,blood loss,and length of stay;(2) postoperative analgesia,incision Grade healing rate.Results The operative time of Laparoscopic group was significantly longer than the laparotomy group,but the laparoscopic group blood loss was significantly less than the open surgery group,postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparotomy group(P 0.05).The laparoscopic group postoperative analgesia was significantly lower than the open surgery group(P 0.05).Postoperative incision laparoscopic group Grade healing rate was slightly higher than the open surgery group,but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P 0.05).All patiens followed up for 1-2 years,laparoscopy group relapsed 2 cases,the laparotomy group recurrence five cases,the recurrence rate was significantly lower than the laparotomy group.Conclusion Laparoscopic myomectomy surgery than open the advantages surgical trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery,fewer complications,should be popularized and applied,it should be noted indications choice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect analysis of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy myomecto my.Methods Among 66 cases of uterine fibroids patients,32 cases of laparoscopic surgery,34 cases laparotomy.Observed and compared:(1) the operative time,blood loss,and length of stay;(2) postoperative analgesia,incision Grade healing rate.Results The operative time of Laparoscopic group was significantly longer than the laparotomy group,but the laparoscopic group blood loss was significantly less than the open surgery group,postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparotomy group(P 0.05).The laparoscopic group postoperative analgesia was significantly lower than the open surgery group(P 0.05).Postoperative incision laparoscopic group Grade healing rate was slightly higher than the open surgery group,but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P 0.05).All patiens followed up for 1-2 years,laparoscopy group relapsed 2 cases,the laparotomy group recurrence five cases,the recurrence rate was significantly lower than the laparotomy group.Conclusion Laparoscopic myomectomy surgery than open the advantages surgical trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery,fewer complications,should be popularized and applied,it should be noted indications choice.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Surgery, Blood loss, Laparoscopy, Laparoscopic surgery, Open surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis on clinical effect of laparoscopic and open myomectomy surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens