2011Xiandai yufang yixueRequires access

COMPARISON STUDY ON THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN MYOMECTOMY

Lin Ma

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open myomectomy.[Methods]58 cases of uterine fibroids were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group,29 cases in each group,they received laparoscopic and open myomectomy respectively and the operating time,blood loss,postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay and complications of the two groups were observed.[Results]Blood loss of laparoscopic group was(62.5±6.0)ml which was significantly less than laparotomy group,the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05);the postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay of laparoscopic group were(10.5±1.2)h,(21.0±2.5)h and(5.7±2.2)d,respectively,which were significantly shorter than the laparotomy group,the difference were statistically significant(P﹤0.05),but the operating time between the two groups had no significant difference(P﹥0.05);the postoperative complication incidence rate of laparoscopic group was 5.2%,and of laparotomy group was 20.1%,the difference between groups was statistically significant(P﹤0.05).[Conclusion]Laparoscopic myomectomy has many advantages such as less trauma,faster recovery,shorter hospital stay and fewer complications,it is worthy of clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open myomectomy.[Methods]58 cases of uterine fibroids were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group,29 cases in each group,they received laparoscopic and open myomectomy respectively and the operating time,blood loss,postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay and complications of the two groups were observed.[Results]Blood loss of laparoscopic group was(62.5±6.0)ml which was significantly less than laparotomy group,the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05);the postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay of laparoscopic group were(10.5±1.2)h,(21.0±2.5)h and(5.7±2.2)d,respectively,which were significantly shorter than the laparotomy group,the difference were statistically significant(P﹤0.05),but the operating time between the two groups had no significant difference(P﹥0.05);the postoperative complication incidence rate of laparoscopic group was 5.2%,and of laparotomy group was 20.1%,the difference between groups was statistically significant(P﹤0.05).[Conclusion]Laparoscopic myomectomy has many advantages such as less trauma,faster recovery,shorter hospital stay and fewer complications,it is worthy of clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open myomectomy.[Methods]58 cases of uterine fibroids were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group,29 cases in each group,they received laparoscopic and open myomectomy respectively and the operating time,blood loss,postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay and complications of the two groups were observed.[Results]Blood loss of laparoscopic group was(62.5±6.0)ml which was significantly less than laparotomy group,the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05);the postoperative out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,length of stay of laparoscopic group were(10.5±1.2)h,(21.0±2.5)h and(5.7±2.2)d,respectively,which were significantly shorter than the laparotomy group,the difference were statistically significant(P﹤0.05),but the operating time between the two groups had no significant difference(P﹥0.05);the postoperative complication incidence rate of laparoscopic group was 5.2%,and of laparotomy group was 20.1%,the difference between groups was statistically significant(P﹤0.05).[Conclusion]Laparoscopic myomectomy has many advantages such as less trauma,faster recovery,shorter hospital stay and fewer complications,it is worthy of clinical application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Blood loss, Surgery, Significant difference, Incidence (geometry), Laparoscopy, Uterine fibroids

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON STUDY ON THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN MYOMECTOMY — Research Paper | ScholarLens