The clinic effect of immediate single-tooth implants and non-functional provisional crowns in the anterior maxilla
Xu Jia
Abstract
Xu Jia
Abstract
Objective To observe the clinical effect of the restoration of a single upper missing tooth with immediate implant placement and non-functional prosthesis in the aesthetic area. Methods Seven consecutive patients with un-savable single teeth in the aesthetic zone were included. Teeth were extracted and replaced with immediate implant and non-functional provisional crowns. Suitable permanent abutments were chosen and porcelain-fused-metal or allceramic restorations were made on the abutments after 6 months. Patients were followed up 1 year after crown insertion. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value immediately after crown insertion and 1 year later were measured for comparison. Results The success rate of implant was 100%, mesial and distal peri-implant bone changes were (0.79 ± 0.48)mm and (0.71 ± 0.46)mm respectively. The average PES value was (8.6 ± 1.3) and (11.1 ± 1.8), respectively. Significant difference was found by Walcoxon analysis (P =0.027). Conclusions For strictly selected cases, single-tooth immediate implant and immediate nonfunctional prosthetsis is an effective method. Good appearance can be achieved and the esthetics of peri-implant soft tissue can be improved over time.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of the restoration of a single upper missing tooth with immediate implant placement and non-functional prosthesis in the aesthetic area. Methods Seven consecutive patients with un-savable single teeth in the aesthetic zone were included. Teeth were extracted and replaced with immediate implant and non-functional provisional crowns. Suitable permanent abutments were chosen and porcelain-fused-metal or allceramic restorations were made on the abutments after 6 months. Patients were followed up 1 year after crown insertion. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value immediately after crown insertion and 1 year later were measured for comparison. Results The success rate of implant was 100%, mesial and distal peri-implant bone changes were (0.79 ± 0.48)mm and (0.71 ± 0.46)mm respectively. The average PES value was (8.6 ± 1.3) and (11.1 ± 1.8), respectively. Significant difference was found by Walcoxon analysis (P =0.027). Conclusions For strictly selected cases, single-tooth immediate implant and immediate nonfunctional prosthetsis is an effective method. Good appearance can be achieved and the esthetics of peri-implant soft tissue can be improved over time.
Key concepts: Crown (dentistry), Dentistry, Implant, Medicine, Prosthesis, Maxilla, Soft tissue, Anterior maxilla