2009Chinese Journal of Stomatological ResearchRequires access

The clinic effect of immediate single-tooth implants and non-functional provisional crowns in the anterior maxilla

Xu Jia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effect of the restoration of a single upper missing tooth with immediate implant placement and non-functional prosthesis in the aesthetic area. Methods Seven consecutive patients with un-savable single teeth in the aesthetic zone were included. Teeth were extracted and replaced with immediate implant and non-functional provisional crowns. Suitable permanent abutments were chosen and porcelain-fused-metal or allceramic restorations were made on the abutments after 6 months. Patients were followed up 1 year after crown insertion. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value immediately after crown insertion and 1 year later were measured for comparison. Results The success rate of implant was 100%, mesial and distal peri-implant bone changes were (0.79 ± 0.48)mm and (0.71 ± 0.46)mm respectively. The average PES value was (8.6 ± 1.3) and (11.1 ± 1.8), respectively. Significant difference was found by Walcoxon analysis (P =0.027). Conclusions For strictly selected cases, single-tooth immediate implant and immediate nonfunctional prosthetsis is an effective method. Good appearance can be achieved and the esthetics of peri-implant soft tissue can be improved over time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the clinical effect of the restoration of a single upper missing tooth with immediate implant placement and non-functional prosthesis in the aesthetic area. Methods Seven consecutive patients with un-savable single teeth in the aesthetic zone were included. Teeth were extracted and replaced with immediate implant and non-functional provisional crowns. Suitable permanent abutments were chosen and porcelain-fused-metal or allceramic restorations were made on the abutments after 6 months. Patients were followed up 1 year after crown insertion. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value immediately after crown insertion and 1 year later were measured for comparison. Results The success rate of implant was 100%, mesial and distal peri-implant bone changes were (0.79 ± 0.48)mm and (0.71 ± 0.46)mm respectively. The average PES value was (8.6 ± 1.3) and (11.1 ± 1.8), respectively. Significant difference was found by Walcoxon analysis (P =0.027). Conclusions For strictly selected cases, single-tooth immediate implant and immediate nonfunctional prosthetsis is an effective method. Good appearance can be achieved and the esthetics of peri-implant soft tissue can be improved over time.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effect of the restoration of a single upper missing tooth with immediate implant placement and non-functional prosthesis in the aesthetic area. Methods Seven consecutive patients with un-savable single teeth in the aesthetic zone were included. Teeth were extracted and replaced with immediate implant and non-functional provisional crowns. Suitable permanent abutments were chosen and porcelain-fused-metal or allceramic restorations were made on the abutments after 6 months. Patients were followed up 1 year after crown insertion. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value immediately after crown insertion and 1 year later were measured for comparison. Results The success rate of implant was 100%, mesial and distal peri-implant bone changes were (0.79 ± 0.48)mm and (0.71 ± 0.46)mm respectively. The average PES value was (8.6 ± 1.3) and (11.1 ± 1.8), respectively. Significant difference was found by Walcoxon analysis (P =0.027). Conclusions For strictly selected cases, single-tooth immediate implant and immediate nonfunctional prosthetsis is an effective method. Good appearance can be achieved and the esthetics of peri-implant soft tissue can be improved over time.

Key concepts: Crown (dentistry), Dentistry, Implant, Medicine, Prosthesis, Maxilla, Soft tissue, Anterior maxilla

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinic effect of immediate single-tooth implants and non-functional provisional crowns in the anterior maxilla — Research Paper | ScholarLens