2005Zhongguo linchuang xinlixue zazhiRequires access

The Rating Scale of Social Ability: Development, and Testing of Reliability and Validity

Yuan Shang-xian

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To develop a Rating Scale of Social Ability (RSSA) and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: The reliability and validity of RSSA were examined the basis of on 1605 normal subjects (814 males and 791 females) from 5 districts of China. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients of RSSA were 0.88~0.92, the split-half reliability were 0.79~0.89, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67~0.86, and the scorer reliability were 0.91~0.97. The correlations between item scores and the total scores ranged from 0.49 to 0.80, and the correlations between the factor scores and composites were 0.76~0.89. The construct validity was supported by factor analysis. Acceptable internal consistency was obtained for total and dimensional scores. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of RSSA and the scores of practice ability, and medium correlation with IQ of WAIS-RC. Conclusion: RSSA has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To develop a Rating Scale of Social Ability (RSSA) and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: The reliability and validity of RSSA were examined the basis of on 1605 normal subjects (814 males and 791 females) from 5 districts of China. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients of RSSA were 0.88~0.92, the split-half reliability were 0.79~0.89, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67~0.86, and the scorer reliability were 0.91~0.97. The correlations between item scores and the total scores ranged from 0.49 to 0.80, and the correlations between the factor scores and composites were 0.76~0.89. The construct validity was supported by factor analysis. Acceptable internal consistency was obtained for total and dimensional scores. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of RSSA and the scores of practice ability, and medium correlation with IQ of WAIS-RC. Conclusion: RSSA has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To develop a Rating Scale of Social Ability (RSSA) and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: The reliability and validity of RSSA were examined the basis of on 1605 normal subjects (814 males and 791 females) from 5 districts of China. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients of RSSA were 0.88~0.92, the split-half reliability were 0.79~0.89, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67~0.86, and the scorer reliability were 0.91~0.97. The correlations between item scores and the total scores ranged from 0.49 to 0.80, and the correlations between the factor scores and composites were 0.76~0.89. The construct validity was supported by factor analysis. Acceptable internal consistency was obtained for total and dimensional scores. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of RSSA and the scores of practice ability, and medium correlation with IQ of WAIS-RC. Conclusion: RSSA has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.

Key concepts: Psychology, Reliability (semiconductor), Cronbach's alpha, Construct validity, Rating scale, Correlation, Scale (ratio), Psychometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Rating Scale of Social Ability: Development, and Testing of Reliability and Validity — Research Paper | ScholarLens