2013Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)Requires access

Academic Credibility: Analysis on the Academic Influence of 24 CSSCI Social Science Journals of Science & Technology Universities in China ——With Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition ) as the Comparative Perspec

Qian Zhen-hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper is to analyze the academic influence of the academic journals from the perspective of journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) in China. The paper selects 24 CSSCI journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) for samples, 3 journals of comprehensive universities as frame of reference, and 1 non-CSSCI journal, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition), for comparation. Based on the data from assessment organizations in China, the current international and domestic general evaluation indexes are employed to analyze the academic influence of these journals concerned, and ?simultaneously the current evaluation approaches for academic journals are investigated. Finally, we explore the system construction for improving the academic credibility of the academic journals in China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper is to analyze the academic influence of the academic journals from the perspective of journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) in China. The paper selects 24 CSSCI journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) for samples, 3 journals of comprehensive universities as frame of reference, and 1 non-CSSCI journal, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition), for comparation. Based on the data from assessment organizations in China, the current international and domestic general evaluation indexes are employed to analyze the academic influence of these journals concerned, and ?simultaneously the current evaluation approaches for academic journals are investigated. Finally, we explore the system construction for improving the academic credibility of the academic journals in China.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper is to analyze the academic influence of the academic journals from the perspective of journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) in China. The paper selects 24 CSSCI journals of universities of science and technology(social sciences edition) for samples, 3 journals of comprehensive universities as frame of reference, and 1 non-CSSCI journal, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition), for comparation. Based on the data from assessment organizations in China, the current international and domestic general evaluation indexes are employed to analyze the academic influence of these journals concerned, and ?simultaneously the current evaluation approaches for academic journals are investigated. Finally, we explore the system construction for improving the academic credibility of the academic journals in China.

Key concepts: Beijing, China, Credibility, Political science, Library science, Social science, Sociology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Academic Credibility: Analysis on the Academic Influence of 24 CSSCI Social Science Journals of Science & Technology Universities in China ——With Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition ) as the Comparative Perspec — Research Paper | ScholarLens