2003Yanwaishang zhiye yanbing zazhiRequires access

A clinical study on the surgery indication and IOL selection after complicated global penetrating injury.

Dong Xiaaguan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the indication and the intraocular lens (IOL) selection after complicated global penetrating injury. Clinical results were evaluated. Methods 78 eyes (78 patients) with traumatic cataract and vitreoretinopathy after complicated global penetrating injury were treated with pars plana vitrectomy, 12 eyes with primary IOL implantation, 57 eyes with secondary anterior chamber IOL implantation and 9 eyes with secondary black diaphragm IOL implantation. The mean follow-up after IOL placement was 12. 8 months. Results The visual acuity afte IOL implantation was much elevated than that after trauma. It was closely related with the traumatic degree of posterior segment. No retinal detachment and bullous keratopathy were observed. Conclusion It is safe and effective to implant IOL for traumatic cataract after complicated global penetrating injury if an optimal operative treatment and an optimal type of IOL are selected.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the indication and the intraocular lens (IOL) selection after complicated global penetrating injury. Clinical results were evaluated. Methods 78 eyes (78 patients) with traumatic cataract and vitreoretinopathy after complicated global penetrating injury were treated with pars plana vitrectomy, 12 eyes with primary IOL implantation, 57 eyes with secondary anterior chamber IOL implantation and 9 eyes with secondary black diaphragm IOL implantation. The mean follow-up after IOL placement was 12. 8 months. Results The visual acuity afte IOL implantation was much elevated than that after trauma. It was closely related with the traumatic degree of posterior segment. No retinal detachment and bullous keratopathy were observed. Conclusion It is safe and effective to implant IOL for traumatic cataract after complicated global penetrating injury if an optimal operative treatment and an optimal type of IOL are selected.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the indication and the intraocular lens (IOL) selection after complicated global penetrating injury. Clinical results were evaluated. Methods 78 eyes (78 patients) with traumatic cataract and vitreoretinopathy after complicated global penetrating injury were treated with pars plana vitrectomy, 12 eyes with primary IOL implantation, 57 eyes with secondary anterior chamber IOL implantation and 9 eyes with secondary black diaphragm IOL implantation. The mean follow-up after IOL placement was 12. 8 months. Results The visual acuity afte IOL implantation was much elevated than that after trauma. It was closely related with the traumatic degree of posterior segment. No retinal detachment and bullous keratopathy were observed. Conclusion It is safe and effective to implant IOL for traumatic cataract after complicated global penetrating injury if an optimal operative treatment and an optimal type of IOL are selected.

Key concepts: Medicine, Vitrectomy, Pars plana, Retinal detachment, Intraocular lens, Ophthalmology, Implant, Case selection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A clinical study on the surgery indication and IOL selection after complicated global penetrating injury. — Research Paper | ScholarLens