2015Anti-infection PharmacyRequires access

Clinical Efficacy of Esomeprazole Combined with Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Liu Ha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods: During the period of July 2010 to July 2014, 126 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding in our hospital were randomized into combination group(n=62) and control group(n=64). The combination group was treated by esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis; and the control group was given esomeprazole alone. Prognosis, hemostatic effect and other indexes were compared in two groups. Results: In combination group, the hemostasis time was(1.6±0.8)d, and in control group,hemostatic time was(3.6±1.2)d(P0.05); In combination group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(439.7±105.2)m L, and in the control group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(921.2±229.5)m L(P0.05). In combination group,hospital stay time was(7.3±1.1)d,hospital stays time in control group was(12.6 ± 1.6) d(P0.05). There were 2 patients rebleeding after hemostasis in combination group, while in control group 10 cases(P0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of combination group was better than that of the control group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods: During the period of July 2010 to July 2014, 126 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding in our hospital were randomized into combination group(n=62) and control group(n=64). The combination group was treated by esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis; and the control group was given esomeprazole alone. Prognosis, hemostatic effect and other indexes were compared in two groups. Results: In combination group, the hemostasis time was(1.6±0.8)d, and in control group,hemostatic time was(3.6±1.2)d(P0.05); In combination group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(439.7±105.2)m L, and in the control group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(921.2±229.5)m L(P0.05). In combination group,hospital stay time was(7.3±1.1)d,hospital stays time in control group was(12.6 ± 1.6) d(P0.05). There were 2 patients rebleeding after hemostasis in combination group, while in control group 10 cases(P0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of combination group was better than that of the control group.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods: During the period of July 2010 to July 2014, 126 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding in our hospital were randomized into combination group(n=62) and control group(n=64). The combination group was treated by esomeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis; and the control group was given esomeprazole alone. Prognosis, hemostatic effect and other indexes were compared in two groups. Results: In combination group, the hemostasis time was(1.6±0.8)d, and in control group,hemostatic time was(3.6±1.2)d(P0.05); In combination group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(439.7±105.2)m L, and in the control group, blood transfusion volume after treatment was(921.2±229.5)m L(P0.05). In combination group,hospital stay time was(7.3±1.1)d,hospital stays time in control group was(12.6 ± 1.6) d(P0.05). There were 2 patients rebleeding after hemostasis in combination group, while in control group 10 cases(P0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of combination group was better than that of the control group.

Key concepts: Esomeprazole, Medicine, Hemostasis, Clinical efficacy, Blood transfusion, Peptic, Endoscopic treatment, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Efficacy of Esomeprazole Combined with Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding — Research Paper | ScholarLens