2007•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

The Dynamics of Identity Conflict

Karina V. Korostelina

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The prevalent view of identity conflicts stresses the difference between con-flicts of interest and those of identity. Many scholars and experts describe conflict as being identity-based because it deals with basic needs and values. Such identity conflicts are categorized by existential needs, values, safety, dignity, and control over destiny and are rooted in complex and multidimensional psychological, historical, and cultural factors. Among the existing needs are participation, consistency, security, recognition, and distributive justice. The frustration of these basic needs along with a denial of human rights leads to social conflicts (Fisher 1997). Such conflicts arise when identity groups perceive that they are oppressed and victimized through a denial of recognition, security, and equity. Burton (1987, 1990) calls such conflicts “deep-rooted conflicts” and points out that they rest on underlying needs that cannot be compromised: interest and position in these conflicts are not negotiable. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The prevalent view of identity conflicts stresses the difference between con-flicts of interest and those of identity. Many scholars and experts describe conflict as being identity-based because it deals with basic needs and values. Such identity conflicts are categorized by existential needs, values, safety, dignity, and control over destiny and are rooted in complex and multidimensional psychological, historical, and cultural factors. Among the existing needs are participation, consistency, security, recognition, and distributive justice. The frustration of these basic needs along with a denial of human rights leads to social conflicts (Fisher 1997). Such conflicts arise when identity groups perceive that they are oppressed and victimized through a denial of recognition, security, and equity. Burton (1987, 1990) calls such conflicts “deep-rooted conflicts” and points out that they rest on underlying needs that cannot be compromised: interest and position in these conflicts are not negotiable. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The prevalent view of identity conflicts stresses the difference between con-flicts of interest and those of identity. Many scholars and experts describe conflict as being identity-based because it deals with basic needs and values. Such identity conflicts are categorized by existential needs, values, safety, dignity, and control over destiny and are rooted in complex and multidimensional psychological, historical, and cultural factors. Among the existing needs are participation, consistency, security, recognition, and distributive justice. The frustration of these basic needs along with a denial of human rights leads to social conflicts (Fisher 1997). Such conflicts arise when identity groups perceive that they are oppressed and victimized through a denial of recognition, security, and equity. Burton (1987, 1990) calls such conflicts “deep-rooted conflicts” and points out that they rest on underlying needs that cannot be compromised: interest and position in these conflicts are not negotiable. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Dignity, Denial, Social psychology, Identity (music), Equity (law), Psychology, Ontological security, Social identity theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dynamics of Identity Conflict — Research Paper | ScholarLens