2007Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

Comparative observation of effects of intravenous iron and oral iron for hemodialysis anemia in patients

Lichen Yang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare of treatment effects of intravenous iron and oral iron on hemodialysis ane- mia in patients with erythropoietin.Methods The oral dosage of ferrous succinate was 200mg dose,3 times a day for 2 months.After washing out for 2 months.Then these patients were given intravenous iron dextran with a dosage of 100mg twice a week for 5 weeks.During the treatment,hemoglobin (Hb),hematocrit (Hct),serum ferritin (SF) and trasferrin saturation(TSAT) were monitored.Results The efficacy of oral iron was 20 % ,the efficacy of intra- venous iron was 60 %.The Hb,Hct,SF and TSATS level increased obviously in the efficacy of intravenous iron,sta- tistical analysis showed a very significant difference(P0.01).Intravenous iron supplement was better than oral iron.Conclusion Intravenous iron might quickly improve anemia,the combination with erythropoietin had an obvi- ous therapeutic effect,which could reduce the blood transfusion and medical expenses.Intravenous iron should be se- lected firstly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare of treatment effects of intravenous iron and oral iron on hemodialysis ane- mia in patients with erythropoietin.Methods The oral dosage of ferrous succinate was 200mg dose,3 times a day for 2 months.After washing out for 2 months.Then these patients were given intravenous iron dextran with a dosage of 100mg twice a week for 5 weeks.During the treatment,hemoglobin (Hb),hematocrit (Hct),serum ferritin (SF) and trasferrin saturation(TSAT) were monitored.Results The efficacy of oral iron was 20 % ,the efficacy of intra- venous iron was 60 %.The Hb,Hct,SF and TSATS level increased obviously in the efficacy of intravenous iron,sta- tistical analysis showed a very significant difference(P0.01).Intravenous iron supplement was better than oral iron.Conclusion Intravenous iron might quickly improve anemia,the combination with erythropoietin had an obvi- ous therapeutic effect,which could reduce the blood transfusion and medical expenses.Intravenous iron should be se- lected firstly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare of treatment effects of intravenous iron and oral iron on hemodialysis ane- mia in patients with erythropoietin.Methods The oral dosage of ferrous succinate was 200mg dose,3 times a day for 2 months.After washing out for 2 months.Then these patients were given intravenous iron dextran with a dosage of 100mg twice a week for 5 weeks.During the treatment,hemoglobin (Hb),hematocrit (Hct),serum ferritin (SF) and trasferrin saturation(TSAT) were monitored.Results The efficacy of oral iron was 20 % ,the efficacy of intra- venous iron was 60 %.The Hb,Hct,SF and TSATS level increased obviously in the efficacy of intravenous iron,sta- tistical analysis showed a very significant difference(P0.01).Intravenous iron supplement was better than oral iron.Conclusion Intravenous iron might quickly improve anemia,the combination with erythropoietin had an obvi- ous therapeutic effect,which could reduce the blood transfusion and medical expenses.Intravenous iron should be se- lected firstly.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intravenous iron, Anemia, Erythropoietin, Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Transferrin saturation, Hemodialysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative observation of effects of intravenous iron and oral iron for hemodialysis anemia in patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens