2010China Practical MedicineRequires access

Clinical Study On the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by the way of TURP

Chen Qiang-hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of transurethral resection of prostate ( TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH). Methods 62 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP surgical treatment and analyse the clinical data. Results The cases of operative time ( 53. 8 ± 21. 2) min; blood loss ( 397. 4 ± 142. 7) ml,resection of the organization an average of ( 26. 8 ± 5. 6) g,time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation ( 36. 2 ± 5. 2) h,indwelling catheter time ( 5. 2 ± 1. 1) d,length of stay ( 7. 8 ± 1. 6) d,TUR syndrome occurred in 2 cases ( 3. 2% ) ,bleeding in 7 cases ( 11. 3% ). After 2 months of IPSS,QOL,RUV,and Qmax,compared with the preoperation,difference was statistically significant ( P lt; 0. 05). Conclusion TURP is a good treatment for BPH; the curative effect is good; It is a safe and ideal surgery with fast recovery and less complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of transurethral resection of prostate ( TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH). Methods 62 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP surgical treatment and analyse the clinical data. Results The cases of operative time ( 53. 8 ± 21. 2) min; blood loss ( 397. 4 ± 142. 7) ml,resection of the organization an average of ( 26. 8 ± 5. 6) g,time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation ( 36. 2 ± 5. 2) h,indwelling catheter time ( 5. 2 ± 1. 1) d,length of stay ( 7. 8 ± 1. 6) d,TUR syndrome occurred in 2 cases ( 3. 2% ) ,bleeding in 7 cases ( 11. 3% ). After 2 months of IPSS,QOL,RUV,and Qmax,compared with the preoperation,difference was statistically significant ( P lt; 0. 05). Conclusion TURP is a good treatment for BPH; the curative effect is good; It is a safe and ideal surgery with fast recovery and less complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of transurethral resection of prostate ( TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH). Methods 62 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP surgical treatment and analyse the clinical data. Results The cases of operative time ( 53. 8 ± 21. 2) min; blood loss ( 397. 4 ± 142. 7) ml,resection of the organization an average of ( 26. 8 ± 5. 6) g,time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation ( 36. 2 ± 5. 2) h,indwelling catheter time ( 5. 2 ± 1. 1) d,length of stay ( 7. 8 ± 1. 6) d,TUR syndrome occurred in 2 cases ( 3. 2% ) ,bleeding in 7 cases ( 11. 3% ). After 2 months of IPSS,QOL,RUV,and Qmax,compared with the preoperation,difference was statistically significant ( P lt; 0. 05). Conclusion TURP is a good treatment for BPH; the curative effect is good; It is a safe and ideal surgery with fast recovery and less complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hyperplasia, Prostate, Urology, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Clinical efficacy, Resection, Blood loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Study On the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by the way of TURP — Research Paper | ScholarLens