Clinical Study On the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by the way of TURP
Chen Qiang-hu
Abstract
Chen Qiang-hu
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of transurethral resection of prostate ( TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH). Methods 62 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP surgical treatment and analyse the clinical data. Results The cases of operative time ( 53. 8 ± 21. 2) min; blood loss ( 397. 4 ± 142. 7) ml,resection of the organization an average of ( 26. 8 ± 5. 6) g,time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation ( 36. 2 ± 5. 2) h,indwelling catheter time ( 5. 2 ± 1. 1) d,length of stay ( 7. 8 ± 1. 6) d,TUR syndrome occurred in 2 cases ( 3. 2% ) ,bleeding in 7 cases ( 11. 3% ). After 2 months of IPSS,QOL,RUV,and Qmax,compared with the preoperation,difference was statistically significant ( P lt; 0. 05). Conclusion TURP is a good treatment for BPH; the curative effect is good; It is a safe and ideal surgery with fast recovery and less complications.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of transurethral resection of prostate ( TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH). Methods 62 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP surgical treatment and analyse the clinical data. Results The cases of operative time ( 53. 8 ± 21. 2) min; blood loss ( 397. 4 ± 142. 7) ml,resection of the organization an average of ( 26. 8 ± 5. 6) g,time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation ( 36. 2 ± 5. 2) h,indwelling catheter time ( 5. 2 ± 1. 1) d,length of stay ( 7. 8 ± 1. 6) d,TUR syndrome occurred in 2 cases ( 3. 2% ) ,bleeding in 7 cases ( 11. 3% ). After 2 months of IPSS,QOL,RUV,and Qmax,compared with the preoperation,difference was statistically significant ( P lt; 0. 05). Conclusion TURP is a good treatment for BPH; the curative effect is good; It is a safe and ideal surgery with fast recovery and less complications.
Key concepts: Medicine, Hyperplasia, Prostate, Urology, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Clinical efficacy, Resection, Blood loss