2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Central Venous Catheter and Continuous Negative Pressure Drainage Suction

YI Haifeng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Object:To study of the availability,safety and limits of treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction.Method:Central venous catheter of 14G was put thoracic cavity with percutaneous dilation.Spontaneous pneumothorax.was treated closed thoracic drainage and continuous negative pressure suction.The result was compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter.Statistical analysis was conducted.Result:1.The majority of spontaneous pneumothorax in our hospital is primary,which is 67.24%.2.There is no significant difference of the time of pulmonary reexpansion and no air leakage between central venous catheter group and traditional thick catheter group.The availability of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD was lower than spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.The difference is significant(P0.01).Incidences of chest pain and catheter drop in central venous catheter group were lower than those in traditional thick catheter group(P0.01,P0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter,treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction is more easily operated,managed and has slight injuries.It is fit for spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.But treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD should be careful with the method and it is unfit for critical pneumothorax.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Object:To study of the availability,safety and limits of treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction.Method:Central venous catheter of 14G was put thoracic cavity with percutaneous dilation.Spontaneous pneumothorax.was treated closed thoracic drainage and continuous negative pressure suction.The result was compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter.Statistical analysis was conducted.Result:1.The majority of spontaneous pneumothorax in our hospital is primary,which is 67.24%.2.There is no significant difference of the time of pulmonary reexpansion and no air leakage between central venous catheter group and traditional thick catheter group.The availability of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD was lower than spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.The difference is significant(P0.01).Incidences of chest pain and catheter drop in central venous catheter group were lower than those in traditional thick catheter group(P0.01,P0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter,treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction is more easily operated,managed and has slight injuries.It is fit for spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.But treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD should be careful with the method and it is unfit for critical pneumothorax.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Object:To study of the availability,safety and limits of treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction.Method:Central venous catheter of 14G was put thoracic cavity with percutaneous dilation.Spontaneous pneumothorax.was treated closed thoracic drainage and continuous negative pressure suction.The result was compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter.Statistical analysis was conducted.Result:1.The majority of spontaneous pneumothorax in our hospital is primary,which is 67.24%.2.There is no significant difference of the time of pulmonary reexpansion and no air leakage between central venous catheter group and traditional thick catheter group.The availability of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD was lower than spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.The difference is significant(P0.01).Incidences of chest pain and catheter drop in central venous catheter group were lower than those in traditional thick catheter group(P0.01,P0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional closed thoracic drainage with thick catheter,treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with central venous catheter and continuous negative pressure suction is more easily operated,managed and has slight injuries.It is fit for spontaneous pneumothorax without COPD.But treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with COPD should be careful with the method and it is unfit for critical pneumothorax.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pneumothorax, Catheter, Central venous catheter, Suction, Surgery, Anesthesia, Percutaneous

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Central Venous Catheter and Continuous Negative Pressure Drainage Suction — Research Paper | ScholarLens