Perfusion imaging with 64-slice CT in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
Liying Chen
Abstract
Liying Chen
Abstract
Objective: To assess the feasibility of 64-CT perfusion of normal pancreas and compare the perfusion parameters between normal pancreas and pancreatic cancer. Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects and 35 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent CT perfusion on a 64-slice CT of Siemens. The raw data was calculated with Siemens software and the perfusion characteristic parameters(including BF, BV, PE, TTP, P) were compared. Results: Pancreatic cancer showed higher P and lower BF, BV and PE compared with those of normal pancreas. Cancer tissue showed lower BF, BV and PE, but higher TTP and P compared with normal tissue in the same patient(P0.05). Pancreatic cancer type 2, 3, 4 showed higher P compared with type 1(P0.05). Conclusion: CT perfusion is a feasible technique to assess pancreatic blood perfusion. Comparation of perfusion parameters of normal tissue and pancreatic cancer tissue of the same patient can be a good option in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Permeability can assess the degree of blood vessels destruction.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To assess the feasibility of 64-CT perfusion of normal pancreas and compare the perfusion parameters between normal pancreas and pancreatic cancer. Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects and 35 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent CT perfusion on a 64-slice CT of Siemens. The raw data was calculated with Siemens software and the perfusion characteristic parameters(including BF, BV, PE, TTP, P) were compared. Results: Pancreatic cancer showed higher P and lower BF, BV and PE compared with those of normal pancreas. Cancer tissue showed lower BF, BV and PE, but higher TTP and P compared with normal tissue in the same patient(P0.05). Pancreatic cancer type 2, 3, 4 showed higher P compared with type 1(P0.05). Conclusion: CT perfusion is a feasible technique to assess pancreatic blood perfusion. Comparation of perfusion parameters of normal tissue and pancreatic cancer tissue of the same patient can be a good option in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Permeability can assess the degree of blood vessels destruction.
Key concepts: Medicine, Perfusion, Pancreatic cancer, Pancreas, Perfusion scanning, Cancer, Nuclear medicine, Radiology