2011Zhongguo yiyuan ganranxue zazhiRequires access

Clinical effect of spray and swab of andoful used for skin disinfection:a comparative trial

Guijie Wang, Lin Shi-jun, Xiao Wei-qiu, Hu XiaoYun, Xie Shi-ying, Linlin Ye, Qiumei Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore disinfection efficacy of swab and spray on skin disinfection with andoful.METHODS A total of 35 subject hands were randomly divided into swab group and spray group.The samples of before and after use in each group were collected separately and observed their disinfection effect.RESULTS The number of bacteria was(21.94±11.93) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(20.60±10.22)CFU/cm2 in swab group before disinfection,were(0.20±0.47) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(0.11±0.32)CFU/cm2 in swab group after disinfection.There was no significant difference between the two groups(all P0.05).The time of disinfection in spray group was significantly less than that in swab group(2.34±0.48)s vs(11.17±1.20)s,P0.05),however,the drying time in spray group was significantly longer than that in swab group(55.17±1.85)s vs(30.31±1.60)s,P0.05).A subject hand disinfection was used 0.5ml andoful in spray group,and was used 0.77ml andoful and two cotton buds in swab group.CONCLUSION There is equal disinfection efficacy in both spray group and swab group.Spray disinfection has short operating time,less use of disinfectant,and without use of cotton buds and so on.It will be able to replace swab disinfection,and play an important role in reducing medical waste and health care costs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To explore disinfection efficacy of swab and spray on skin disinfection with andoful.METHODS A total of 35 subject hands were randomly divided into swab group and spray group.The samples of before and after use in each group were collected separately and observed their disinfection effect.RESULTS The number of bacteria was(21.94±11.93) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(20.60±10.22)CFU/cm2 in swab group before disinfection,were(0.20±0.47) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(0.11±0.32)CFU/cm2 in swab group after disinfection.There was no significant difference between the two groups(all P0.05).The time of disinfection in spray group was significantly less than that in swab group(2.34±0.48)s vs(11.17±1.20)s,P0.05),however,the drying time in spray group was significantly longer than that in swab group(55.17±1.85)s vs(30.31±1.60)s,P0.05).A subject hand disinfection was used 0.5ml andoful in spray group,and was used 0.77ml andoful and two cotton buds in swab group.CONCLUSION There is equal disinfection efficacy in both spray group and swab group.Spray disinfection has short operating time,less use of disinfectant,and without use of cotton buds and so on.It will be able to replace swab disinfection,and play an important role in reducing medical waste and health care costs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore disinfection efficacy of swab and spray on skin disinfection with andoful.METHODS A total of 35 subject hands were randomly divided into swab group and spray group.The samples of before and after use in each group were collected separately and observed their disinfection effect.RESULTS The number of bacteria was(21.94±11.93) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(20.60±10.22)CFU/cm2 in swab group before disinfection,were(0.20±0.47) CFU/cm2 in spray group and(0.11±0.32)CFU/cm2 in swab group after disinfection.There was no significant difference between the two groups(all P0.05).The time of disinfection in spray group was significantly less than that in swab group(2.34±0.48)s vs(11.17±1.20)s,P0.05),however,the drying time in spray group was significantly longer than that in swab group(55.17±1.85)s vs(30.31±1.60)s,P0.05).A subject hand disinfection was used 0.5ml andoful in spray group,and was used 0.77ml andoful and two cotton buds in swab group.CONCLUSION There is equal disinfection efficacy in both spray group and swab group.Spray disinfection has short operating time,less use of disinfectant,and without use of cotton buds and so on.It will be able to replace swab disinfection,and play an important role in reducing medical waste and health care costs.

Key concepts: Disinfectant, Medicine, Cotton swab, Significant difference, Surgery, Internal medicine, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect of spray and swab of andoful used for skin disinfection:a comparative trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens