Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Zaleplon Tablet in Healthy Volunteers after A Single Oral Administration
Fang Fěng
Abstract
Fang Fěng
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of zaleplon in 20 healthy volunteers. METHODS:A single oral dose 10mg zaleplon of reference or test drugs was given to each volunteer according to an open randomized crossover study. The concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC-ESI-MS method after liquid-liquid extraction methods. RESULT:The main pharmacokinetics parameters of zaleplon were as follows: rt/2were 1.17±0.19h and 1.14±0.12h, tmax were 0.83 ± 0.12h和0.91± 0.12h, Cmax were 28.47 ± 2.62mg.L-1 and 28.12 ± 3.44mg.L-1, AUC0-8 were 52.83 ± 4.81mg.h-l-1 and 54.92± 8.83mg.h.L-1 for test tablet and reference capsule, respectively. The relative bioavailability of F0-8 and F0-∞ were (98.3 ± 16.5) % and (98.0 ± 16.4) %, respectively . CONCLUSION':The result of statistical analysis showed that two formulations were bioequivalent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE:To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of zaleplon in 20 healthy volunteers. METHODS:A single oral dose 10mg zaleplon of reference or test drugs was given to each volunteer according to an open randomized crossover study. The concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC-ESI-MS method after liquid-liquid extraction methods. RESULT:The main pharmacokinetics parameters of zaleplon were as follows: rt/2were 1.17±0.19h and 1.14±0.12h, tmax were 0.83 ± 0.12h和0.91± 0.12h, Cmax were 28.47 ± 2.62mg.L-1 and 28.12 ± 3.44mg.L-1, AUC0-8 were 52.83 ± 4.81mg.h-l-1 and 54.92± 8.83mg.h.L-1 for test tablet and reference capsule, respectively. The relative bioavailability of F0-8 and F0-∞ were (98.3 ± 16.5) % and (98.0 ± 16.4) %, respectively . CONCLUSION':The result of statistical analysis showed that two formulations were bioequivalent.
Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Volunteer, Cmax, Crossover study, Pharmacology, Chemistry