2001•Journal of Clinical HematologyRequires access

Comparison of clinical outcome between autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantantion and autologous bone marrow transplantation

SHI DONG HONG

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical outcome of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation(ABMT).Methods:Twenty one patients received ABMT and 20 received APBSCT in our hospital.Conditioning regimens were TBI 6.6 ~ 8.8 GY+CTX 100~120 mg/m 2 or MAC(Mel 140 mg/m 2+Ara C 2~4 g/m 2+CTX 120 mg/kg).Results:Twenty patients in ABMT and all of APBSCT group engrafted successfully.Transplant related death was in 2 ( 9.5 %)patients in the ABMT and no patients in the APBSCT group.Four(20%)patients in ABMT and 5(25%)in APBSCT group relapsed.The 2 year probabilities of disease free survival(DFS)for ABMT and APBSCT group were ( 68.5 ± 10.87 %)and( 62.34 ± 14.26 %)respectively.Conclusions:The clinical outcome of APBSCT is similar to ABMT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the clinical outcome of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation(ABMT).Methods:Twenty one patients received ABMT and 20 received APBSCT in our hospital.Conditioning regimens were TBI 6.6 ~ 8.8 GY+CTX 100~120 mg/m 2 or MAC(Mel 140 mg/m 2+Ara C 2~4 g/m 2+CTX 120 mg/kg).Results:Twenty patients in ABMT and all of APBSCT group engrafted successfully.Transplant related death was in 2 ( 9.5 %)patients in the ABMT and no patients in the APBSCT group.Four(20%)patients in ABMT and 5(25%)in APBSCT group relapsed.The 2 year probabilities of disease free survival(DFS)for ABMT and APBSCT group were ( 68.5 ± 10.87 %)and( 62.34 ± 14.26 %)respectively.Conclusions:The clinical outcome of APBSCT is similar to ABMT.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical outcome of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation(ABMT).Methods:Twenty one patients received ABMT and 20 received APBSCT in our hospital.Conditioning regimens were TBI 6.6 ~ 8.8 GY+CTX 100~120 mg/m 2 or MAC(Mel 140 mg/m 2+Ara C 2~4 g/m 2+CTX 120 mg/kg).Results:Twenty patients in ABMT and all of APBSCT group engrafted successfully.Transplant related death was in 2 ( 9.5 %)patients in the ABMT and no patients in the APBSCT group.Four(20%)patients in ABMT and 5(25%)in APBSCT group relapsed.The 2 year probabilities of disease free survival(DFS)for ABMT and APBSCT group were ( 68.5 ± 10.87 %)and( 62.34 ± 14.26 %)respectively.Conclusions:The clinical outcome of APBSCT is similar to ABMT.

Key concepts: Medicine, Transplantation, Peripheral blood, Bone marrow, Surgery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clinical outcome between autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantantion and autologous bone marrow transplantation — Research Paper | ScholarLens