2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Clinical observation of nedaplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Hua Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy and side effects of gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-smal cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:A total of 60 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were divided into the gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin group(group GN,n=30): Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;nedaplatin 80mg/m2,d2,iv drip;And the gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group(group GP,n=30).Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;cisplatin80-100 mg/ m2,divided into three days to iv drip.All patients were undergone 2 cycles,each cycle 21 days.Results: The efficacy of group GN was 36.67% and group GP was 40.00%,there was no significant difference between the two group in curative effect(P0.05).A higher response rate of digestive reaction(80.0%) occurred in group GP,compared to that occurred in group GP(56.7%),with a significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference between two groups in the toxicity of kidney.There was a lower incidence of leucopenia response rate(50.0%) in group GP than in group GN(56.7%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).There was a lower thrombocytopenia response rate(66.7%) in group GP than in group GN(73.3%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).Conclusion:There is no significant difference between gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group and nedaplain group in the effect and there is a lower digestive reaction than cisplatin group.the main adverse reaction was myelosuppression and allergic reaction,in the treatment of NSCLC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe the efficacy and side effects of gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-smal cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:A total of 60 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were divided into the gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin group(group GN,n=30): Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;nedaplatin 80mg/m2,d2,iv drip;And the gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group(group GP,n=30).Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;cisplatin80-100 mg/ m2,divided into three days to iv drip.All patients were undergone 2 cycles,each cycle 21 days.Results: The efficacy of group GN was 36.67% and group GP was 40.00%,there was no significant difference between the two group in curative effect(P0.05).A higher response rate of digestive reaction(80.0%) occurred in group GP,compared to that occurred in group GP(56.7%),with a significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference between two groups in the toxicity of kidney.There was a lower incidence of leucopenia response rate(50.0%) in group GP than in group GN(56.7%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).There was a lower thrombocytopenia response rate(66.7%) in group GP than in group GN(73.3%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).Conclusion:There is no significant difference between gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group and nedaplain group in the effect and there is a lower digestive reaction than cisplatin group.the main adverse reaction was myelosuppression and allergic reaction,in the treatment of NSCLC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy and side effects of gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-smal cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:A total of 60 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were divided into the gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin group(group GN,n=30): Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;nedaplatin 80mg/m2,d2,iv drip;And the gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group(group GP,n=30).Gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2,d1,8,iv drip;cisplatin80-100 mg/ m2,divided into three days to iv drip.All patients were undergone 2 cycles,each cycle 21 days.Results: The efficacy of group GN was 36.67% and group GP was 40.00%,there was no significant difference between the two group in curative effect(P0.05).A higher response rate of digestive reaction(80.0%) occurred in group GP,compared to that occurred in group GP(56.7%),with a significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference between two groups in the toxicity of kidney.There was a lower incidence of leucopenia response rate(50.0%) in group GP than in group GN(56.7%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).There was a lower thrombocytopenia response rate(66.7%) in group GP than in group GN(73.3%),but no significant difference between the groups(P0.05).Conclusion:There is no significant difference between gemcitabine combined with cisplatin group and nedaplain group in the effect and there is a lower digestive reaction than cisplatin group.the main adverse reaction was myelosuppression and allergic reaction,in the treatment of NSCLC.

Key concepts: Nedaplatin, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Medicine, Lung cancer, Internal medicine, Significant difference, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation of nedaplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens